School consolidation on the agenda again

Each year, the boards of Evanston’s two school districts hold a joint meeting to discuss ways they can better work together, and consolidation of the two districts is a topic that’s often on the agenda. It’s there again this year.

The public portion of the meeting will begin at 7 p.m. Monday in Room N112 at Evanston Township High School.
Since they met together last January, a group of students at Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management conducted a study on consolidation for District 65 that was presented to its board in August.
The report suggested an alternative to consolidation: virtual consolidation.
Without formally consolidating, the boards could agree to share a common superintendent and administrative staff, for example, in much the same way that the two districts share in the operation of the Park School for special-needs students.
With superintendents of both districts nearing retirement age, there could be an opportunity for the two districts to hire one superintendent, who could oversee the operations of both districts, but still operate under guidance from the two boards.
Similarly, accounting, purchasing, accounts payable, technology, facilities maintenance, human resources, public relations, and perhaps other functions could be handled more efficiently under a virtual consolidation arrangement, the report suggested.
Each board would continue to negotiate contracts with its teachers as it does now, thereby overcoming a stumbling block in previous consolidation discussions that have stalled because of a perceived inability to deal with different teacher pay scales in the two districts.
Other items on the agenda for discussion at Monday’s meeting include the transition from middle school to high school, and advocacy of legislative interests.
 

Comments

School district consolidation

The obscenly high adminsitrative costs of our single school high school district and the obscenly high salaries of the two superintendents will finally hopefully be addressed.  Universial high quality public education with excellent teachers well compensated is my goal--I am unhappy paying such high taxes for non-teaching administrators of whom there are way too many.

Novel but impractical

The Kellogg team has put forth a novel idea, but no one in his or her right mind would be the superintendent of two school boards. One is hard enough. That said, why does the community continue to want two school boards?

Totally practical based on other cities and states

Take a look at other cities and other states.  There are many, many of them that have a school superintendent for K-12.  The district that I attended was K-12 with one superintendent and the district provided a very high quality education.  To me, it always seemed odd that Evanston has two school districts for K-12.
Has there ever been a study that shows the performance of children in a school district based on the ratio of teachers to non-teaching administrators and staff?  My suspicion is that those districts with a higher teacher to non-teaching administrator and staff ratio provide the best quality education.
The Kellogg proposal sounds great.