harley-clarke-east-faceimg_1002

An alderman Monday suggested the Evanston Art Center will have to pay more money to stay in the Harley Clarke mansion.

Alderman Judy Fiske, 1st Ward, said EAC should pay rent at a rate similar to what the city charges artists at the Noyes Cultural Arts Center.

For the roughly 16,000 square foot mansion, that would work out to about $200,000 a year.

EAC for decades has had a $1 a year lease on the mansion with the city.

At a Human Service Committee meeting where they were joined by dozens of arts center supporters, the non-profit’s executive director, Norah Diedrich, and board president, Tess Lickerman, said that when the center went looking for a new home recently, they determined it would cost $4 million to $8 million to buy and equip a suitable new property.

Top: The Harley Clarke mansion. Above: Tess Lickerman and Norah Diedrich at the Human Services Committee meeting.

But a fundraising feasibility study indicated the group could only raise between $2 million and $2.5 million.

The city has concluded the mansion needs $170,000 in immediate life-safety improvements plus another $100,000 for a study to determine the full scope of repairs needed.

Diedrich and Lickerman said EAC wants to fully renovate the building, and that they are confident they can raise more than $2.5 million to do it.

After more than an hour of public comment, the committee voted to recommend that City Manager Wally Bobkiewicz work with EAC to negotiate a new lease agreement.

Alderman Jane Grover, 7th Ward, said of EAC’s request for at least 60 days to discuss a new lease, “I think it is a fair request and well within the realm of reasonable.”

Alderman Mark Tendam, 6th Ward, said he agreed with Grover, but added that he hoped EAC in the future would also be “more inclusive” of larger swath of city residents.

Five of the committee’s six members were present for the session. Alderman Coleen Burrus, 9th Ward, didn’t attend the session.

About two dozen people spoke at the meeting in support of the art center.

Resident and retiree James McHolland, the father of Chute Middle School principal Jim McHolland, said taking art classes at the center had changed his life.

“My teacher has been transforming of my life, he has bled out of me an artist I didn’t even know existed,” he said.

And Evanston Township High School visual arts teacher Pam Sloane said EAC programs provide affordable supplements to the classes offered at ETHS, especially for students who can’t take certain art classes due to schedule conflicts.

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

  1. Evanston Art Center

    There was an overflow crowd in City Council Chambers last night to hear why the City should come to a workable agreement for the Art center to remain in its current and long standing home.

    I wish that Evanston Now would publish director Norah Diedrch's  remarks about the specifics that the Evanston Art Center provides to our community and beyond in terms of education, outreach, and cultural enrichment in addition to opportunities for employment, providing a lure for people to live and work here, providing a market for many local businesses.

    It would be a community service for those who do not know this essential arts institution and how important it is to our community.  It is also a reminder to those of us who have profited from classes with outstanding professional artists and built careers with skills acquired through programs offered by EAC  just how important the Evanston Art Center is to the image and soul of our city.

    I hope we are smart enough to provide a workable arrangement so the Evanston Art Center can remain an Evanston institution.

  2. EAC

    The issue is not, and has never been, whether EAC is a formidable asset for the community and its residents.

    The question is who pays the bills? As a property tax soaked Evanston resident, the proposed sale of the mansion and proposed use as a profit-making, tax-paying entity thrilled my heart, so long as access to the beach and park behind the building could have been maintained. Evanston's ever-vocal NIMBY crowd crushed that notion as one embraced only by some outside philistines.

    I do not want to be stuck with paying for the renovation of an admittedly stately piece of Lakefront architecture that ultimately must be fixed up or torn down. If the artsy-fartsy crowd can foot the bill, fine by me. Methinks they can't, which is why the place has been falling down around them in the first place. And if they could the boutique hotel proposal would have never gained any traction in the first place. It's past time for those who want to maintain Evanston as a living museum to put their money where their ever loud mouths are.

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published.