City staff will ask Evanston aldermen Monday night to define what options they’re willing to consider for the future of the city-owned Harley Clarke mansion on the lakefront.

City Manager Wally Bobkiewicz says that based on the council’s discussion Monday night he hopes to be able to prepare a request for proposals document that will define:

  • Whether to include some surrounding land or only the mansion building and coach house in the request for proposals.
  • Whether the property should be offered for sale, or only for long term lease, and, if for lease, for what duration.
  • Whether to consider offers from for-profit or non-profit entities or both.


Peeling paint in a coach-house apartment living room.

Bobkiewicz will also ask the aldermen to decide whether to take immediate action to address problems in the coach house including mold and peeling paint.

The aldermen decided in June to postpone a decision about what to do with the mansion until this month after a special mayoral committee only marginally narrowed the range of possible options for the mansion’s future and residents appeared still sharply divided over what to do with it.

The two aldermen on the mayoral committee have said they believe a new mansion use needs to be self-supporting — at least to the extent of not requiring an operating subsidy from the city.

The committee heard proposals that included turning the property into a boutique hotel, converting it to a residence for senior citizens, making it a non-profit event space or redeveloping the property with single family homes.

The Evanston Art Center, which had leased the mansion from the city for decades for $1 a year, relocated last May to a commercial building it purchased and renovated at 1717 Central St.

A city staffer in the mansion’s third-floor great room during a recent inspection tour.

Neither the city nor the art center had fully lived up to shared maintenance responsibilities under the mansion lease, which has left the building needing renovation work projected to cost millions of dollars.

A previous plan to lease the mansion to the state as a new offices for the natural resources department’s Coastal Management Program fell through after a change of leadership in Springfield.

Two years ago, after issuing a previous request for proposals for the mansion, aldermen rejected out of hand the only formal proposal received —  Jennifer Pritzker’s plan to turn the property into a boutique hotel — after opponents demanding the the city retain ownership of the property turned out in droves for a City Council meeting.

Bobkiewicz says he also hopes to schedule an open house at the mansion for interest people to visit the property next month and, after that, present a draft of the RFP for the council to review at its Oct. 19 meeting.

Related stories

Harley Clare action postpone until fall (6/9/15)

Aldermen: New mansion use needs to be self-supporting (6/2/15)

Mayor sees no hope of state help for mansion (4/14/15)

Alderman to Pritzker: ‘Nevermind’ (7/23/13)

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation


  1. I thought was already decided ?
    The Council has been pretty clear–fund every special project that ‘their’ voters want; fund any ‘arts’ building and charge the least possible rent they can and make no requirements for maintenance or loan payback; preserve anything including decrepit building, out of date street lighting that the preservationist want; and make taxpayers pay for it all.

  2. Don’t ask them, ask us, the taxpayers
    The city council had their chance and they blew it – big time. How about if we, the Evanston citizens, decide what we want. Wally can come up with five ideas and whatever one gets the most votes is what the city does with the mansion. As far as I’m concerned, the city council had an excellent chance to produce a tax generating deal and save a beautiful piece of property but they rejected Jennifer’s idea and we are now stuck with this money pit of a building. Maybe if Wally could swallow his pride and ask Jennifer if she is still interested then this could be idea number 1 (both literally and figuratively) .

    1. I don’t think Wally was part

      I don't think Wally was part of the origional problem. I believe that he wanted to get permission to negotiate with Pritzer's group but was denied by the council when they chickened-out when 400 people showed up at council meeting and whined.

      This will never be put to a vote because the council new that they screwed up and 40 k of voters will correct their screw up.


Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *