State Sen. Daniel Biss (D-Evanston) has introduced legislation that would dramatically reduce caps on individual contributions to political campaigns while providing state matching funds for small contributions.

Senate Bill 1424, dubbed the “Small Donor Democracy Matching System for Fair Elections Act,” would reduce the ceiling on contributions from an individual to a single campaign from $5,600 to $500.

The legislation would establish a small donor matching system for statewide races in Illinois, including governor, attorney general, comptroller, treasurer, secretary of state, as well as for contests for state senators and state representatives.

Contributions between $25 and $150 from local donors would be matched 6:1 by public funds. But limits would be set on the amount of public funds available to each candidate.

“This is about who decides,” Biss said. “Life is getting harder for more and more Americans every day because people who are already doing well have all the power in government – powerful people who are shamefully out of touch with the people they represent.

“We’re only going to fix this problem if we weaken the connection between money and political power and make it easier for small donors’ voices to be heard.”

The Illinois Campaign for Political Reform, which supports the proposal, estimates the cost of the matching program at about $13 million a year — or a dollar for each resident of the state.

“It’s time for Illinois to step up to the plate and implement this long-overdue reform, which would ensure that the voices of local donors are amplified in Illinois elections,” David Melton, ICPR senior advisor said. “Everyone should have an opportunity to run for office and participate in the political process, not just the 1 percent of wealthy donors and candidates.”

Jay Young, political director for Common Cause Illinois, said Illinois witnessed unprecedented campaign spending in 2016, including nine statehouse races that exceeded $2 million in contributions and a comptroller’s race that soared past the $12 million mark.

“The voices of ordinary citizens in this state are being drowned out right now by the unlimited spending of wealthy political donors,” Young said. “We believe that proposals like the one Senator Biss has put forward will allow the people to take back their democracy from these powerful special interest groups.”

Given U.S. Supreme Court rulings that have barred restrictions on independent political spending and caps on total campaign contributions by individuals, it’s not clear whether the Biss plan would actually reduce political spending or simply shift the flow of money to different channels.

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation


  1. I oppose matching donations

    This is all about incumbent politicians amplifying their control of the political system in three easy steps: 1) create a cottage industry of “straw donors”; 2) create additional taxes to fund this matching game while controlling the purse; 3) impose additional regulations on how these moneys can be spent.

    Can Mr. Bliss tell us what is so evil than it cannot be accomplished with $500, but can be with $5600? And what about them PACs?

    1. Who is the target ?

      Are Trump supporters the target ?

      In Illinois and at least Chicago and Evanston, a ham sandwich would get elected if had a little flag ‘Democrat’ on it.  Probably the target is to keep Republicans, Independents, Libertarians and others from having funding to get elected. The Democrats know they don’t need the funding since re-election is a given.

      Like most, I don’t like all this money being wasted on campaigns, but I doubt this is the answer and certainly ‘fair’ campaigns and elections are not the purpose Biss and his supporters have in mind.

  2. Biss looks more and more supportive

    Biss looks more and more supportive of transparency and limits on control of elections by the wealthy or at least those who get plenty of help.

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published.