Evanston Township trustees voted Tuesday night to have an audit conducted of how the township provides its services.

The audit concept, proposed by Alderman Ann Rainey, 8th Ward, postponed a decision on what to do next after the voters said by a 2-1 margin earlier this year that they want the board to continue efforts to dissolve the township.

The aldermen appeared to be deeply split between two of four “next step” options proposed by City Manager Wally Bobkiewicz.

Rainey, plus Aldermen Coleen Burrus, 9th Ward, and Mark Tendam, 6th Ward, said they favored negotiating a formal intergovermental cooperation agreement between the township and city that would see the city take over most or all of the township’s functions.

Alderman Delores Holmes, 5th Ward, said she favored continued pursuit of informal cooperation between the two governmental entities.

“The township seems to be moving to make some cost cuts and cooperate more with the city,” Holmes suggested.

Alderman Don Wilson, 4th Ward, said continued informal cooperation could be a precursor to a formal agreement.

Alderman Peter Braithwaite, 2nd Ward, said he was concerned that a formal agreement would end up doing away with the township staff.

But Rainey said that’s why an audit is needed. “We don’t know enough about how the township functions,” Rainey said. “There are a lot of people working over there, and we need to understand how it’s administered.”

When the proposal to continue with informal cooperation was put to a vote, it failed 3-5, with Braithwaite, Holmes and Wilson voting for it.

There seemed to be little appetite on the board for continuing to pursue legislation to give Evanston voters the right to dissolve the township, after a bill to that effect stalled in Springfield this spring.

Nor did there seem to be much interest in the fourth option Bobkiewicz proposed — of doing nothing.

The trustees told Bobkiewicz to identify a firm to conduct the audit.

The board voted 7-1 without debate to introduce the township budget, with a final vote set for June 11.

And it voted to refer a proposed set of town board procedural rules to the July 2 Human Services Committee meeting to give trustees time to send questions about the rules to the city attorney for review and response ahead of that meeting.

Related story

Evanston town to set course on dissolution

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation


  1. Sounds like city ignores the voters

    The voters 2 to 1 said the Township should be abolised. The Council instead puts bandages on the problem and thinks they have a 'solution.'  What don't they understand by a taxpayer vote.  Do they think 33% for is a majority.

    Solution—vote the non-responsibe Council [and others] out !

  2. Trustees don’t know what Township is doing?

    "Evanston Township trustees voted Tuesday night to have an audit conducted of how the township provides its services."

    The Council have been Township Trustees for three years and they still don't know how/what the Township actually does??? The idea of the City being more efficient at providing these services has been kicked around for at least a year and the Council doesn't know exactly how???

    Maybe the Council should spend less time debating fire hydrant paint jobs and more on understanding City operations.

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *