Evanston’s two school boards—District 65 and District 202—have pretty much dismissed the idea of consolidating. Instead, they agreed at a joint meeting Monday night to look for more opportunities to collaborate.

District 65 President Katie Bailey noted that the two districts engage in a fair amount of collaboration already, in such areas as legislative lobbying and operation of the Park School for students with special needs.

In fact, they took one collaborative step Monday night by agreeing to a joint resolution calling on the Illinois General Assembly to take action to resolve the state’s pension problems in a way that minimizes the impact on state funding for education.

They heard a brief presentation from a former student of Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management, Tyler Thornton, and her supervising professor, Therese MGuire, who had conducted a study last year for District 65 that recommended “virtual consolidation” as a way to increase efficiencies and educational effectiveness of the two boards.

The Kellogg study pointed to Lake Forest School Districts 67 and 115 as a possible model for intergovernmental cooperation.

The Lake Forest boards, according to the Kellogg report, eliminated 11 positions by sharing a superintendent and administrative center. They also jointly contracted services such as cleaning, auditing, and appraising and achieved some economies in technology improvements.

Previous attempts over the years to consolidate the two Evanston-Skokie districts into one regularly bogged down on the issue of teacher salaries, in that high school teachers enjoy higher salaries than teachers in the K-8 system.  The assumption was always made that teachers in a unified district would have to share the same salary structure that would effectively make consolidation more expensive for taxpayers.

District 202 members Jonathan Baum and board president Mark Metz  suggested that collaborative efforts begin with a statement of objectives and that they look for ways of achieving those objectives better through joint efforts.

District 65 member Richard Rykhus suggested that the best place to start would be on operational issues. He said that financial savings would then have a positive impact on academic initiatives that would be more likely to be funded.

The two boards already have a joint coordinating committee established and they agreed that this committee should be encouraged to develop proposals for additional collaborative opportunities.

Charles Bartling

A resident of Evanston since 1975, Chuck Bartling holds a master’s degree in journalism from Northwestern University and has extensive experience as a reporter and editor for daily newspapers, radio...

Join the Conversation


  1. Evanston school board members have no vision or backbone

    Collaborative efforts? Sounds like bureaucratic double speak.

    These board members have no vision or backbone.

    D65 raised our taxes 3 percent this year. Wait until the State Legislature kicks the teacher's pensions down to local school districts. It will severely disrupt the school budgets and then school board members will have to either raise taxes or gut the budget in order to pay for the teacher's pensions. Take a guess which option our school board will take.

    The teacher's pension should be a key issue in the D202 School Board race that is unfortunately the only contested race in our local schools. So sad.

    Federal, state, city and local school districts have all been consistently raising taxes. When does it end?

    You can't hold elected officials accountable when they run in uncontested races.

  2. Teachers are the problem?

    Amazing how considerate the Boards of these two local school districs are to the teachers – concerned that they might have to mitigate teachers salaries in a consolidated school district.

    Of course there is no mention of the substantial savings that would occur in administration and management fees, in conolidation of support services and overheads.

    There is even less mention of the streamlining that will take place when students move from elementary to high school in terms of paperwork, documentation and rigmarol.

    Finally, why would a collection of petty beaurocrats wish to eliminate their feifdoms, their personal domains where they get to strut and puff apon a stage.

    But – as both boards seem to have discovered, consolidation cannot be acheived because of the teachers.

    Now, if only they could eliminate teachers and students then the boards could show everyone how to really run a school district.

  3. School boards

    To the previous commentor I would say then, perhaps you should run for school board.It is much easier to stand on the sidelines and make an extremely complex issue appear to be simple than to work to improve the situation from the inside.

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *