reservoir-access-img_1787

City officials took Evanston aldermen and a handful of curious residents on a bus tour of proposed capital improvement projects Saturday. And the really big-ticket stop was at the at the city’s water plant.

There, on top of an access hatch to the city’s 79-year old, five-million-gallon water reservoir, Utilities Director Dave Stoneback had laid out part of his case for spending about $26 million over the next several years on a replacement.

Stoneback said core samples of the reservoir roof takien by a consulting firm show that it’s deteriorating and needs replacement.

He said the dark horizontal lines running through the samples are signs that concrete is cracking and losing its strength.

The reservoir sits on land leased to the city by Northwestern University and the roof of the reservoir is used as an NU parking lot.

Replacing just the roof of the reservoir has been estimated to cost $4 million.

But Stoneback says the reservoir is undersized for the city’s current water demand and staff is exploring the possibility of adding more storage capacity — which would require a completely new reservoir.

The city has another five-million gallon reservoir within the water plant itself, and Stoneback says that with careful monitoring of plant operations, the city could get through the construction period for a new reservoir with just the single reservoir in service.

On a Google + Hangout this morning, Evanston Now’s Bill Smith asked City Manager Wally Bobkiewicz why the city is now leaning toward the much more expensive version of the project.

The reservoir also sits on land adjacent to planned new north-campus athletic facilities planned by the university and there’s discussion with the school about shifting the location of a new reservoir to better fit in with those plans.

Stoneback said the city had explored the idea of building a new reservoir on the university’s Long Field, just west of Sheridan Road.

But current design requirements for reservoirs demand that their tops be at least two feet above the adjacent terrain and also require an large overflow pipe that would need to run back to the lake.

Those factors, he said, seemed to make the Long Field location impractical.

Some residents have raised questions about whether an entirely new reservoir is actually needed, or whether the much less expensive roof replacement project would be sufficient.

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

  1. New Site for Reservoir

    After the city bulldozes the Harley Clarke mansion, the reservoir can be placed on that land. What better use can there be for something that is too precious to sell and too costly to fix,

    The roof of the reservior can be used as a changing house for the lake and an event center. Maybe an outdoor basket ball court can be added. The neighbors can make a good use of it.

    We can trade something that is nearly worthless to us for something that is vitally needed.

  2. Who does Wally work for Nu or Us taxpayers?

    The report by CTL clearly states the tank top should be replaced. The cost $4 million dollars.  There are no budget numbers in the report for the $26 million for the entire tank replacement.

    If we have $22 million extra, which we do not, it should be used to replace water pipe under the streets.

    The city in this budget cycle is asking for a 10% water bill increase, what will be this increase to the water bills for 22 million?  if it was covered by property tax for 30 years it would amount to a 5% increase in the property tax bills, if this was to occur this year, and was adding in  to the other property tax increases It would close to 10%!

    I find it very troubling city employees rather than looking for a cost effective solution want the most expensive.

    Also given NU seems interested in moving the tank, per statements from Wally and David Stonebeck,  If NU wants it moved they shoud paid. If we fix the top and leave it were it is  the city should pay.

    What is interesting Wally and David keep having different stories here, on what is going on with the tank and why it  is justified, things are not adding up very well. Listen to Bill's interview of Wally carefully.

     

     

     

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published.