1011-mcdaniel-25-foot-lot

Evanston aldermen tonight will be asked to consider developing a special use process to permit construction of modest “starter” homes on small lots.

Decades ago Evanston permitted construction of homes on lots as narrow as 25 feet wide.

One of many examples of such developments is the row of three homes in the 1000 block of McDaniel Avenue in the photo above.

They were built around 1960 in what’s now an R2 zone on lots about 25 feet wide and 120 feet deep or roughly 3,000 total square feet in size.

County records indicate each of the homes has a little over 1,000 square feet of living space.

Current Evanston zoning rules require that lots be at least 35 feet wide in R1 and R2 zones and set a minimum lot size requirement of 7,200 square feet in R1 and 5,000 square feet in R2 — making it impossible to build homes similar to the McDaniel homes on similar-size lots in Evanston today.

A staff memo on the proposal says it would reduce the land cost involved in developing a single family home and therefore tend to make it possible to build homes affordable to first-time homebuyers and less affluent residents.

The memo, from Assistant City Manager Erika Storlie, says it would also permit development of vacant parcels too small to build on under current zoning rules.

The memo also suggests the special use process could be used to limit the size of homes that could be built on such lots to help maintain affordability.

And it suggests considering restrictions on resale through a land trust or deed restrictions to maintain long-term affordability. Whether such restrictions would in practice deter development of the parcels isn’t addressed in the memo.

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Leave a comment

The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published.