The Evanston City Council tonight is scheduled to consider a new $2 a ton fee on garbage haulers who dump material at the solid waste transfer station on Church Street.

The Veolia transfer station on Church Street.

The transfer station, owned and operated by Veolia Environmental Services, has been a frequent target of complaints from nearby residents about odor problems and other adverse impacts on the neighborhood.

But the city is also concerned about wear-and-tear that trucks hauling the 160,000 tons of waste that pass through the facility each year cause to the city’s streets, and hopes the fee will help cover some of those roadway maintenance costs.

The transfer station handles loads from surrounding communities as well as from within Evanston.

Although the transfer station has been located along the former Mayfair railroad right-of-way in Evanston for many years, the city has not previously charged a fee to its users.

A staff memo says other towns in the metro area that have transfer stations impose fees ranging from 30-cents to $2.75 per ton.

The city manager has built anticipated revenue from the fee into his budget plans for 2011.

Update 11 a.m. 10/27: The City Council voted to introduce the fee ordinance Monday night. A representative from Veolia objected to the plan during the citizen comment period at the council meeting. Final action on the ordinance is scheduled for Nov. 8.

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

  1. Also…

    You better use some of that tax money to make decent repairs to Church St. not just these bad patch jobs. You could also increase revenue by ticketing these speeding trucks. Every morning starting at 6am they go flying down the road without a care in the world. If there is a $500.00 fine for speeding on Church St. you could make thousands of dollars in fines alone.

  2. Trash Fees

    Why did the city let the transfer station operate for years without imposing any fees? If nearby towns are charging a per ton fee then Evanston should have done so years ago. It is bad enough that Veolia negatively impacts Evanston.

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published.