Evanston aldermen tonight are scheduled to discuss a staff proposal intended to clarify the city’s requirements that planned developments provide public benefits in exchange for the grant of zoning allowances.

The existing rules have come in for criticism for appearing to allow developers to list benefits inherent to the development itself — like an increase in the city’s tax base — or otherwise required by the zoning code — like achieving a LEED silver environmental rating — as counting toward the public benefit requirement.

The current public benefits section of the city code runs just 192 words. The proposed new one is over 900 words long.

It strikes out references to improving the tax base, achieving LEED silver and “creating a pleasing environment.”

And it adds a long list of public benefit examples, including:

  • Providing more affordable housing than required by the city code.
  • Encouraging alternative modes of transportation with car-sharing spaces and memberships, bike share sponsorships and other strategies.
  • Providing streetscape improvements, including street trees, benches, wayfinding signage and wider sidewalks.
  • Providing infrastructure improvements like traffic signal upgrades and traffic calming measures.
  • Funding public art displays near the development.
  • Achieving LEED Gold or higher environmental certification, certification for migratory bird protection or providing electric vehicle charging stations.
  • Creating apprenticeship or training programs for local residents.
  • Preserving and restoring historic landmarks on or near the property.
  • Dedicating park space to the city, providing publicly accessible park or garden areas in the development or providing funds to maintain or upgrade existing nearby parks.

The new ordinance would also add a lengthy — but ultimately vague — set of standards for evaluating the sufficiency of public benefits and provides that the City Council may ask for additional public benefits beyond those proposed by the developer as a condition for approving the project.

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation


  1. What if no request for zoning change

    Woulld a developer of a planned development who is not requesting a zoning change be required to conform to these proposed new public benefits?

    1. The answer

      Hi Dan,

      Assuming no variances were requested, then the answer would be “no.”

      However, given the restrictions imposed by the zoning code, it’s difficult to envision any developer of a sizable project not feeling the need to request at least some variances to make the project financially viable.

      I can’t off-hand recall an instance in which a no-variances planned development has been proposed here. (Although perhaps somebody else can think of one.)

      — Bill

      1. variances

        In a way variance request are the essence of a planned unit development.  People assume that when a developer is asking for variance he is somehow trying to take advantage of the community.

        In reality, it’s kind of how a community insures getting input on a newly built project, kinda the community is taking as much advantage as they can of the developer.  Virtually nothing would be built new without variance, not just larger buildings but small 1-2 story properties, residential or commercial..  

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published.