The City Council this evening is scheduled to vote on hiring a team of consultants to prepare a revised downtown plan for Evanston.

The city staff is recommending that the $236,324 contract be awarded to a team led by Duncan Associates of Chicago.

Other contractors on the project would include the Lakota Group, which led the Downtown Visioning project in 2004 and is now working on the Central Street Master Plan, 180 Design Studio of Kansas City, traffic engineers KOLA Inc. and real estate market consultants Goodman Williams Group.

In addition to developing a new downtown plan, the project also calls for conducting a pilot study of form-based zoning for several downtown blocks and conducting a real estate market analysis and a parking utilization study, as well as a public participation process for the project.

The consulting contract is the outgrowth of over a year of work by the Plan Commission’s Downtown Plan Committee, which has been trying to figure out what, if any, zoning revisions are needed downtown after the recent wave of new development in the city.

At the Downtown Plan Committee meeting last Friday, Plan Commission Chairman James Woods offered several variations on possible new zoning maps for the downtown area.

The new proposals call for two transitional zones around the fringe of downtown, rather than the one transition zone contained in previous map drafts.

He also raised the question of whether the central core area of downtown should have uniform zoning throughout, or whether it should have two or three subzones with different height limits.

As a result of recent City Council and Plan Commission actions approving new high-rise projects along the south side of the Emerson Street corridor, Mr. Woods new map proposals call for exending the downtown boundary a half block north of Emerson, to the alley south of Garnette Place.

The committee has yet to come up with any firm proposals on specific height limits for different zones, but Mr. Woods suggested Friday that setting an average building height limit and requiring setbacks from the street a few floors above ground could give developers some flexibility about tower height while providing a pedestrian-friendly streetscape.

The committee also discussed the possibility of eliminating current height bonuses for enclosed but above ground parking, and providing such height bonuses only for underground parking.

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation


  1. Downtown Planning Process
    I think it is high time that the citizens of Evanston stop muttering, sputtering and grousing and insist that a moratorium be imposed on consideration of new construction in “downtown” Evanston while the Downtown Planning Committee and the new consultant group come up with a coherent reasoned plan. Otherwise, all this effort and money spent becomes just another academic exercise in “what if” thinking while the non-Evanstonian developers continue putting their own profit-driven imprint on the actual land sites with their ongoing piecemeal submittals (and approvals) of grandiose plans for our city.

    Jessica Feldman

    1. Lack of Clear Downtown Plan spells trouble
      I agree that a moratorium would be a smart move by the Council. The Council needs to seriously address the lack of a cohesive downtown plan. Whether the process is led by the sub-committee of the PC or a combination with an outside consultant, something needs to be done NOW before it is too late. Now that the 50-story proposal is “in the pipeline,” it will not be considered to fall under the downtown plan, if and when approved. While I would hope clear thinking will prevail, this is a disturbing chain of events. The same goes for 1890 Maple, which has all but been given the go-ahead simply because an 18 story building was approved nearby. Developers know exactly how to play the game, once zoning allowances have been given for one building — the neighborhood is fair game for anything.

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *