Evanston aldermen Monday moved toward trimming the proposed 2012 property tax hike from 8 to 5 percent by raising parking meter rates, trash fees and parking violation fines.

Parking meter rates will soon be more taxing.

Evanston aldermen Monday moved toward trimming the proposed 2012 property tax hike from 8 to 5 percent by raising parking meter rates, trash fees and parking violation fines.

They also voted to restore four forestry worker jobs slated for elimination by the city manager.


Aldermen voted 8-1 to raise parking meter rates by 25-cents an hour — to $1 downtown and 75-cents in other areas — a proposal introduced by Alderman Don Wilson, 4th Ward.

City staff estimated that it could take until April 1 to implement the meter rate change and that having the increase in effect for nine months would bring in about $525,000 in new revenue.

Alderman Judy Fiske, 1st Ward, who owns a pet supply store downtown, cast the only vote against the increase. She said higher rates would lead to fewer customers making shorter shopping trips.

Fiske also argued for making rates the same across all business districts, but Alderman Melissa Wynne, 3rd Ward, defended the disparity, saying some outlying business districts “aren’t as strong as downtown,” and it’s easier for people there to park nearby while avoiding the meters.

The downtown rate increase will make meter rates there match rates in the city’s three downtown parking garages.


The aldermen voted 5-4 to increase fines for all parking tickets except those for expired meters by $5. That proposal, introduced by Alderman Coleen Burrus, 9th Ward, is expected to raise about $300,000.

Aldermen Braithwaite, Fiske, Wilson and Wynne voted against that increase.

The aldermen rejected the idea of raising fines for meter violation, which could have added another $230,000 in revenue.


The aldermen also voted 5-4 to raise the rates charged for garbage pickup. Fees for a large, 95-gallon refuse cart would rise $2 to $12.95 a month, while the rate for a small, 65-gallon cart would increase $1 to $7.95 a month.

Mayor Elizabeth Tisdahl said the larger increase for the bigger carts would be “environmentally progressive” because residents could choose to recycle more and use the smaller carts.

Alderman Ann Rainey, 8th Ward, initially objected to any increase in the small cart fee and Alderman Don Wilson initially had proposed a bigger increase — as much as $4 for large carts and at least $1.50 for the smaller ones.

The numbers finally approved were proposed by Alderman Jane Grover, 7th Ward.

Aldermen Braithwaite, Fiske, Holmes and Rainey voted against the version that was adopted.

City staff estimates the large cart increase will rase $336,000 while the small cart increase will generate $50,000.


The aldermen voted unanimously to restore the jobs of the four forestry workers. That move is expected to add $140,000 to the city’s expenses, compared to the outsourcing contract City Manager Wally Bobkiewicz had proposed.

Special budget meeting tonight

With the council meeting running past 11:15 p.m., aldermen deferred discussion of several additional budget adjustments to a special meeting to be held at 6:30 p.m. this evening, at which Bobkiewicz promised to present a one-page summary of how to balance the budget while trimming the property tax increase.

Update 12:05 p.m. 11/15/11: Late this morning we learned that there’s uncertainty among city staff about whether the vote to raise the 95-gallon trash container rate was for a $2 or a $4 increase. They’re checking the DVD of the council meeting now to try to sort it out what was a fast-moving discussion among the aldermen.

Update 5:45 p.m. 11/15/11: The city’s community information coordinator, Eric Palmer, now says that, after reviewing the tape, the vote was to raise the 95-gallon trash container rate by $4. That would raise $772,000 in new revenue, assuming the increase is made effective Jan. 1.

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. Here we go again

    The city is raising fees and fines to try and lower the inevitable property tax hike.

    Other cities are cutting staff including firefighters and privatizing services. Not Evanston. Labor cost is the big ticket item that needs to be dealt with.

    As our City Council raises fees, fines, utility rates and closes libraries, art centers and maybe the Ecology Center it gives annual pay raises to government unions.

    So I ask. Why should Evanstonians every year put more skin in the game by paying higher fees, fines, rates and property taxes when government union employees get annual pay raises and other benefit perks? The City Council last year raised property taxes to pay for union pension debt.

    The biggest insult in that is most government union employees don't live in Evanston.

    Four years into the Great Recession and when was the last time an Evanston firefighter was laid off?

    Answer – once but they were quickly rehired after the Evanston Firefighter's Union sued the city for unfair labor practices. 

    What if taxpayers sue the city for unfair taxation practices. Would that lower our property taxes in proportion to our declining property values?

    The good thing is taxpayers don't have to sue: they have the power to organize and vote!!! Any candidate willing to fight the government unions has my vote and support.

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *