The Evanston/Skokie District 65 School Board is showing an inclination to expand a summer learning program that involves more students as it inches towards the concept of year-round schooling.

After presenting its plan for the 2014 summer program at the board’s January 21 meeting, district assistant superintendents Susan Schultz and Ellen Fogelberg returned Monday night to present alternatives, including a “Plan B” that would represent the ultimate benefit for the largest number of students, but at increased cost.

Basically, Plan A focuses on “reducing summer learning loss in the critical early grades by extending that experience to rising second grade students from Dawes, continuing the program at Oakton and Washington, and providing a similar experience to rising third grade students from across the district,” the administrators said in a background memo.

Plan A would employ 73 teachers and 25 aides and would serve 915 students at a total cost of $333,540.

The more elaborate Plan B would provide service to students from pre-kindergarten through grade 7.

“Students in grades 2, 3, and 4 would be offered a full-day program, with academics in the morning and recreation and enrichment In the afternoon,” the memo said. It would also provide half-day programming for students in grades 5, 6, and 7 that are focused on literacy and math skills, as well as transition to middle school.

Plan B would build on partnerships established with the McGaw YMCA and the Youth Organizations Umbrella, as well as the district’s charitable arm, Foundation 65.

Plan B would employ 128 to 129 teachers and 25 aides and would serve 1,515 students at a total cost of $737,540.

One of the “challenges” with Plan B, the administrators said, is that it was too large to operate with only regular District 65 teachers. It would require hiring additional teachers who may not be familiar with the way District 65 operates, they told the board.

Board members expressed the view that they would like to go beyond Plan A, but not to the full extent encompassed by Plan B.

They were particularly enamored by the prospect of serving more of the younger students, for whom summer learning loss has proved to be a critical factor in student test scores. A program to help students going into the middle schools, while desirable, could be sacrificed if sufficient funds were not available, they said.

Board members also expressed an interest in serving students at all grades who have special needs.

The fate of the summer program now turns to the board’s Finance Committee, which is expected to further fine-tune the program at its meeting Monday night. The district hopes to finalize the 2014 summer program before the end of the month so that parents can make appropriate plans with their students.

 Related story:

Cold got you down? D65 is thinking summer

Charles Bartling

A resident of Evanston since 1975, Chuck Bartling holds a master’s degree in journalism from Northwestern University and has extensive experience as a reporter and editor for daily newspapers, radio...

Join the Conversation


  1. Year Round School

    The story says

    "“challenges” with Plan B, the administrators said, is that it was too large to operate with only regular District 65 teachers. It would require hiring additional teachers"


    What about the way some schools do this and have year round for all students with several sorter vacations through the year—instead of one three month summer vacation.

    This should allow existing teacher and other staff to meet the same volume.

    One objection I'm sure would be raised to the two plans mentioned is that students need vacation.  This would deal with that.

    Are their statistics about how many students actually work in the summer ? Given reports of the high teen unemployment, year round school does not sound like it would dis-advantage [many] students—and not forgettingn what they learned during the 'regular year' might mean they are better prepared for college or jobs when they graduate.

  2. This is the first I’ve heard

    This is the first I've heard of this plan. Is either plan optional as many parents value the time summer affords for their children to attend camp, play, visit family & friends and generally explore and develop their own interests? I also would like to know how the city plans to pay for this and why is it not being offered to every student in the district? If it's going to be implemented, it should be optional and it should be available to everyone.

    1. Improvements to Summer Learning Program

      As a member of the D65 School Board, I think its important to clarify that the summer learning program proposal for this summer expands community partnerships to provide for sustained, focused learning opportunities for specific students – looking to reach 900-1000 D65 students in total.  This program is built to do the best to address summer learning slump and impact the achievement gap that persists for our students.  It was not designed to move toward a full year school model and is not designed to replace summer learning experiences that many of our youth already participate in.  We are seeking to create an experience that delivers both academic focus and enrichment opportunities so that together we will get higher participation, gains and overall success from the program at the earliest ages.  I would recommend folks refer to the taped board meeting or board notes for additional details.


Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *