Wednesday was Evanston Day in Springfield. A busload of about 50 elected officials, staffers and citizens descended on the capital to express their views to legislators and state officials on issues of importance to Evanstonians.
What they found, to no one’s surprise, was a willingness to do about anything the delegation wanted as long as it didn’t cost the state additional money.
Except for Senate Bill 2874 that would approve a binding referendum to consolidate the Township of Evanston into the City of Evanston as a way to provide the same or additional services at a lower overhead cost, little encouragement was heard on other issues, such as public safety pension reform, avoidance of additional higher costs for teacher pensions, and an increase in the Monetary Award Program that helps needy college students pay their tuition bills.
The local delegation included Mayor Elizabeth Tisdahl; City Manager Wally Bobkiewicz; Aldermen Coleen Burrus, Peter Braithwaite, and Jane Grover; District 202 School Board members Martha Burns and Gretchen Livingston; District 65 School Board member Jerome Summers; District 202 Superintendent Eric Witherspoon; and school chief financial officers Mary Brown of District 65 and Bill Stafford of District 202.
The wailing and gnashing of teeth from state officials began with remarks at a luncheon in the governor’s mansion from Department of Human Services Secretary Michelle Saddler, who, along with her husband, is a longtime Evanston resident and is a graduate of Northwestern’s Kellogg Graduate School of Management.
Noting that some 90 percent of general fund dollars go towards education, health, public safety, and human services, it is the latter that has borne the brunt of cuts in the state budget, amounting to $794 million last year and $600 million this year, she said.
While efforts have been made to shift investment away from institutional care and more towards residential care in the community, she added, the state has had to close two centers for the developmentally disabled and is looking to close two psychiatric hospitals in order to make ends meet.
“We have been shredding our safety net,” Saddler said, as case loads have more than doubled while the number of case workers has declined by a third.
“We don’t have enough staff, and we don’t have enough money,” she said.
She was followed at the lectern by Julie Hamos, a former state legislator representing a large portion of Evanston who is now director of Healthcare and Family Services.
While she needs to cut some $2.7 billion from her $18 billion budget, she is faced with a vast underfunding situation, where the expenses are mandated by state and federal law, but the funds to meet those mandates are not available.
“Consequently, we spend as if the money is there, but we are so underfunded that we can’t afford to pay our providers,” she said. “We push off paying our bills into the next year.”
A bad economy not only lessens the amount of funds available from state and federal sources, she lamented, but it generates more needy people that rely upon those funds. At the same time, health care costs continue to rise, which makes the situation even worse to deal with.
“It is a deep hole that we need to get out of,” she declared.
In a session later in the afternoon with Evanston-based legislators, State Rep. Daniel Biss predicted that “we are not going to be out of these budget challenges for a long time.”
Reps. Gabel and Biss
Supt. Witherspoon noted that the state has threatened to shift its contribution to teacher pensions from the state to the school districts themselves. In the case of District 202, he said, this would add $2 million a year to the district’s current $60 million operations budget, thereby shifting a state responsibility onto the shoulders of property tax payers.
Biss replied that for the state “to dump the cost onto someone else is ludicrous.” He suggested that a better solution would be for the state to give the district its current $2 million with the proviso that in future years, the contribution would increase only by the amount of increase in the consumer price index.
“That way,” he said, “if the district’s costs (for pensions) increase by more than the CPI, then you’ll suffer, while if you keep the increase at less than the CPI, you’ll benefit.”
The Evanston delegation also heard from Rep. Robyn Gabel, Sen. Jeff Schoenberg, and Sen. Heather Steans.
Mayor Tisdahl and Sen. Steans
There was a brief meeting with State Treasurer Dan Rutherford, whose staff led the delegation on a tour of the vaults beneath the treasurer’s office that contain contents of abandoned assets, mostly from bank safe deposit boxes, that become the property of the state when their rightful owners cannot be located.
The day at the Capitol ended with an audience with Gov. Pat Quinn, who lauded the group for coming to Springfield, and who posed for a group photo followed by a round of hand-shaking before the Evanstonians boarded their chartered bus for the return home, arriving back in Evanston shortly after 9:30 p.m.
Top: Gov. Quinn with Mary Brown, District 65 CFO; Suzette Robinson, Evanston Public Works Director; Jane Grover, 7th Ward Alderman; and Jessica Vlahogiannis, North Shore United Way Program Director
Evanston Elected officials with too much time on their hands!
It appears most of the elected officials who traveled down to Springfield have way too much time on their hands. How many of them actually hold down real jobs in the private sector of any importance?
What was the purpose of the trip, other than a photo opt? We all know there is NO money down in Springfield, and there is no money here. Unless of course you are handing out our tax dollars to fund Wine and Cheese Bars on Howard Street!
Soon we will have to pay for Five council members to travel to Washington on our nickel, most likely costing us over $10,000. what will they learn there? There are NO federal funds for them to waste, so you should waste the local taxpayers money.
Good point Ponzi-no money
Springfield doesn't have spare cash to give Evanston, Washington DC doesn't have spare cash to give Evanston, so why is Evanston even thinking about building a new school and why is there opposition to eliminating the Township? Are the people in favor of a new school loaded with spare cash? Is that where the money is going to come from ?
The new school is projected to cost $25 Million, plus it is expected to cost $ 1-2 Million per year to operate. This will be a high cost school since it will require many extra services, so it will really cost $2-3 Million per year (just watch)
Eliminating the Township is expected to save $500,000 + per year and the City of Evanston will provide the same services – we can actually save money.
Hello! What am i missing?
Springfield said "NO MONEY"
Washington DC said "NO MONEY"
No money, No New School, No Township
Leave a comment