Several general assistance clients and other residents Monday night questioned plans to abolish Evanston Township and have the city take over its functions.

The discussion came after several previous public meetings on the issue and after aldermen, acting as the township trustees, had voted to formally adopt measures approved in concept last week to put an advisory referendum about township dissolution on the March election ballot and ask the state legislature to clarify conflicting statutes about how to go about the abolition process.

Top: Residents listen to the debate about the township’s future. Above: Montez Cannida speaks to the town board.

Montez Cannida of 1610 Darrow Ave. asked officials to “please look into it thoroughly” before shutting the township.

Canada said that, in addition to general assistance payments, the township also provides “community networking” and other services for clients that he feared would be lost.

“I’m sure you don’t want to hurt nobody, and I don’t want to hurt nobody,” Canada added, “but you need to go over the fine print.”

Martha Young of 1710 Monroe St. praised the work that the township assessor’s office had done to help her 75-year-old mother, who she said suffers from dementia, reduce her property taxes.

Young said she herself has been on general assistance for a while now and the she’d received very good treatment from township workers.

“It takes special people to help special people,” Young said. “From my understanding the city is firing people, so how is it that now all of a sudden you’re going to have money to pay different people to address some of the issues that we, the clients, have?”

Mary Baker.

And Mary Baker of 139 Ridge Ave., said she was going to be evicted from her home and was living with no electricity until Alderman Ann Rainey, 8th Ward, told her she could apply to the township for general assistance.

“I would be homeless if it wasn’t for the township’s general assistance program,” Baker said.

Some speakers appeared at least partially reassured by statements from City Manager Wally Bobkiewicz and other officials that the city would continue the general assistance program, and continue to levy taxes to pay for it.

He added that the city might even be able to increase benefits from expected savings from reducing administrative costs.

But other speakers still opposed any change.

Albert Gibbs, who described himself as a lifelong Evanston resident, said, “We should leave this alone. If it’s not broke, why fix it?”

The town board voted 5-3 to hold the referendum, with trustees Braithwaite, Holmes and Wilson voting no.

It voted 6-2 to ask for statutory revisions from the legislature, with Wilson joining in support of that vote.

Alderman, and trustee, Jane Grover, 7th Ward, didn’t arrive at the meeting until after the votes were taken.

Related stories

Voters to be polled on township future (Nov. 30)

Manager sees 40% savings from abolishing township (Oct. 25)

Aldermen seek more info on dissolving township (Sept. 20)

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation


  1. Abolish the Township?

    I am so distressed with the actions of  the majority of the city council regarding their desire to abolish a working organization that is in most ways run well.  

    As someone brought up last night, I am one of those who watches almost every council meeting and pay taxes through owning a home ( three in all since the late 60's).  Never have I heard that the township is not run well.

    A nitpick item is when renting space on Main Street may have been a misstep;  however, do you know all of the particulars as to the economy at the time, available rental space at the time ( I am a Realtor for about for 30 years) and other  factors such as a good rental deal at the time?

    There s something else working here and you know it.  As a taxpayer, I will not be happy with this council when you cost us legal fees due to a misstep in going forward with this matter and the unknown that this is, cost us a bundle.

    As you know, legal fees have burned us many times in the past. More people will come out that know what this organization does for so many. Save money you say… interesting that this million dollar budget of the Township vs. your 250 million dollar budget ( I may be off a bit) is on your radar and yet you will rent to a non profit organization a valuable space( city owned) for $4,000 a month for an in door sports arena, yet we need a space to store salt and you will cost us a bundle to deal with that issue.

    If people looked more carefully at these 2 items, you would have to wonder why? who? and so on.



  2. Evanston Township

    If anyone took a look at their rea estate tax bill, you would see that the cost of running Evanston Township is $.62 a half year.  That's sixty-two cents a half year per home owner.  When was the last time we got anything that run so well for so little money?  It makes no sense at all to do away with the Evanston Township assessor's office … makes no sense at all.

    1. Township tax bill

      Please check your math.

      For your annual township tax bill to be $1.24, the market value of your home would have to be about $35,000.

      While the township tax is a small slice of the total property tax bill, it amounts to about $13 for an owner-occupied home valued at $367,000 — what the U.S. Census Bureau says is the median price of a home in Evanston.

      — Bill

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *