Plans for a 19-story senior living development at 1621 Chicago Ave. in Evanston came in for praise and criticism from residents at a 1st Ward meeting Wednesday night.

The rental project from Horizon Realty Group, now dubbed The Merion Legacy, would have 240 units ranging in size from studios to three-bedroom apartments and 85 parking spaces in an underground garage.

It would be connected to Horizon’s existing senior living development, The Merion, just to the south at 1611 Chicago Ave.

Renderings of the proposed high-rise, looking south and north along Chicago Avenue.

“It’s vital to have high density development downtown,” said one man at the meeting. “I think it’s a terrific project.”

But another said, “Parking in the neighborhood is almost impossible” already and the new development would only make it worse.

The architect for the project, Tim Kent of Pappageorge Haymes, said there’s a trend across the nation of reducing parking ratios for new developments because car ownership levels are dropping and people are relying more on ride sharing.

“Twenty-five years ago a building like this would have had a parking ratio of two cars per dwelling unit,” Kent said. “Now we’re doing high rises in Chicago that are in the same range as this — 0.3 spaces per unit — because demand is so much lower.”

Horizon’s Jeff Michael said the parking garage at the 24-story Park Evanston building across the street is only a third to a half full.

And Alderman Judy Fiske, 1st Ward, said owners of the Evanston Place apartments nearby are trying to sell some of the unused space in their building, which also houses the city’s Church Street garage.

A woman in the audience said she liked the idea of a senior living setting like the planned development. “I see it for myself in 10 years,” she said.

But a man in the crowd raised objections to having the driveway entrance to the building on Chicago Avenue.

“It’s going to be a nightmare,” he said, claiming that traffic already backs up on the block with drivers trying to turn left into the Whole Foods parking lot across the street.

Jeff Michael.

But developer Jeff Michael said a traffic consultant’s study shows that the development won’t adversely affect traffic in the area.

Michael said the project would increase the annual property tax generated from the site from about $110,000 to about $650,000 and that the it would also create about 50 new permanent jobs.

The developers plan to make a $2.4 million contribution to the city’s affordable housing fund, as required by the version of the inclusionary housing ordinance in effect when they submitted their planned development application last December.

The project seeks planned development allowances from the city for floor area ratio and building height, and for the number dwelling units, parking spaces and loading docks.

The plan will require a two-thirds vote of the City Council for approval. But before it gets there it will be subject to reviews by the Design and Project Review Committee and the Plan Commission. Those meetings have yet to be scheduled.

Related stories

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation


  1. Need more not less new resident building

    The Council and other groups push for more Affordable housing but fight almost every proposal to put up a new buiilding. Not only for Affourdable housing but Evanston’s profligate spending.

    You don’t get more housing with restrictiions or punishing builders from putting up buildings or rent control—you provide for more housing.

    1. High rise gets mixed reviews

      As usual, it seems, the developer will not be required to include any actual affordable housing units. With between 200-300 units in the building, why not? Evanston needs the actual affordable housing, rather than another contribution to a nebulous fund. I would like the City and City Council to insist on the inclusion of affordable units now rather than kicking the can down the road. 

      1. Why not?

        Hi EW,

        The short answer to “why not” is that the version of the inclusionary housing ordinance in effect at the time the planned development application was submitted did not require on-site affordable units.

        In addition, the city is starting to discover that by leveraging tax credit financing and other programs it may be able to make its affordable housing money go farther by spending the fee in lieu money elsewhere.

        For example, the city last month committed $2 million in fee-in-lieu money to a project that is expected to yield 60 units of affordable housing for seniors on Howard Street. And there are preliminary plans to do something somewhat similar on South Boulevard.

        Some developers have included on-site affordable units, though, including 15 units in the Albion development now under construction on Sherman Avenue and 17 in the Trammell Crow development on Oak.

        — Bill

    2. I agree with “Need More Not Less New Resident Buildings”

      Excellent point. I’m all for it, even though it would probably block my view of the lake, since I’m right across the street at the Park Evanston. Guess we’ll have to go up a few floors.

      1. The alley is already

        The alley is already frequently blocked by trucks at both ends, so cars have difficulty getting in and out of the church parking lot and probably the lot for the apartment building to the south.  If there is alley use by service vehicles, it will be intolerable. And where are the garbage bins going?

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published.