teachers-d65-1611150img_3322

If there was any doubt that pressure is building for settlement of contract negotiations between the Evanston/Skokie School District 65 and its teachers, there was evidence aplenty displayed at Monday night’s meeting of the school board.

Hundreds of teachers, chanting and holding up hand-drawn signs, many with their own kids in tow, filled the hallways outside the board room, at 1500 McDaniel Ave., as board members, parents, and interested citizens arrived for a regular meeting of the board.

Inside the board room, a steady stream of teachers, parents, and even a retired citizen, spoke to the board, urging it to settle quickly before a strike occurs around the beginning of December.

It was apparent that hardly anyone wants a strike.

The teachers were eager to continue working without an interruption in their paycheck or an unscheduled break in the execution of their lesson plans.

Board members were eager to bring the matter to a successful conclusion before they had to face the voters in the upcoming April elections.

Parents were especially eager to avoid a strike, forcing many to make expensive plans for child care during the times their kids are usually in school. Many are concerned about feeding their children, particularly those on the federal free or reduced lunch program.

Even the unaffiliated homeowners expressed fears of a decline in the value of their homes if the community was unable to reconcile the differences between the two sides, resulting in the negative publicity that accompanies a strike.

Many of them were still depressed over the results of the recent Presidential election, in which only 7 percent of the voters in Evanston saw their candidate appear triumphant.

And money for salaries was not even a big issue separating the two sides.

Teachers were advocating for more planning time and better working conditions that would enable them to do a better job in the classroom.

Board members were interested in holding down costs in fear that the state, which many considered to be dysfunctional, might saddle them with pension and other costs that they might not be in a position to meet without taking drastic action that would adversely affect the kids.

At the same time, they were hoping that teachers would find the resulting contract appealing to them, to deter the better teachers from seeking a more lucrative job elsewhere.

The biggest difference between the two sides was the length of the contract. The board is seeking a traditional four-year contract while the teachers want to hold it to a year, in the hopes that the political situation, both at the state and federal level, settles down, enabling them possibly to make a better deal next year.

In the meantime, several negotiation sessions are scheduled before the end of November, and Superintendent Paul Goren, facing his first teacher contract settlement since he came aboard last year, even agreed to meet over the weekend for as long as it takes to reach an agreement.

But in the end, all sides were quick to employ the district motto: “Every child, every day, whatever it takes.”

Related story

D65, teachers closing in on a contract

Charles Bartling

A resident of Evanston since 1975, Chuck Bartling holds a master’s degree in journalism from Northwestern University and has extensive experience as a reporter and editor for daily newspapers, radio...

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. Thoughts on D65 contract negotiation

    I hope a mutually agreeable contract can be reached in the near future.

    As a parent of a current District 65 student i want to express my appreciation to all the outstanding teachers in our district. I and many others in our community understand the challenges teachers confront in the classroom, and respect their dedication and professionalism on behalf of all students throughout the district.

    As i read through the proposals from both D65 and DEC, i was surprised that there was no discussion or quantification of the cost of providing teachers with a defined benefit pension. The cost of providing this benefit has increased substantially over the last decade, yet there appears to be no recognition or understanding of this important issue. 

    The pension benefit for a retiring teacher today costs well over $1,000,000. While teachers contribute between 8-9% of their annual salary, Evanston taxpayers and other Illinois taxpayers are liable for the difference and bear all the risk. Today, less than 10% of all US employees have a defined benefit pension.

    The average compensation for a D65 approximates $94,000 per year; including $79,000 for salary, $8,000 for healthcare, and $10,000 for pension. (the 10k for pensions is the taxpayer portion, and does not include the $7,000 contributed by teachers)

    Hopefully a contract agreement can be reached so that our teachers, administrators, and school board can continue to fulfill our district's mission. 

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published.