The Evanston Library Board’s vote Wednesday to break free of the City Council’s budget control and establish its own tax levy may not provide as big a long-term boost to library spending as the plan’s supporters hope.

The Evanston Library Board’s vote Wednesday to break free of the City Council’s budget control and establish its own tax levy may not provide as big a long-term boost to library spending as the plan’s supporters hope.

The six library board members who voted for the tax levy.

Assistant City Manager Marty Lyons says that as a separate fund, the library will need to assume responsibility for a variety of costs that now don’t show up in the library line item of the city budget.

Lyons told Evanston Now Thursday it’s too early to tell just how big those costs will be, but that over the next month or so his staff will be researching the issue to come up with numbers.

The city now provides a variety of services — including payroll, human resources and legal representation — to the library department that aren’t charged back to it.

In addition, Lyons said, its not clear whether the bonds that funded construction of the new downtown library have been completely paid off yet. If not, he says, the cost of remaining payments would need to be shifted to the library levy.

And future library capital improvement projects akin to the recent renovation to the children’s and teen areas of the library, or the projected creation of a new south branch library, may have to come out of the library’s tax levy. In the past those improvements were paid for from the city’s capital improvement fund.

Because the library board’s levy is subject to a state-imposed tax cap expressed as a percentage of the community’s equalized assessed valuation, the recent decline in property values — unless it soon reverses itself — will also affect the library board’s ability to fund its programs. And unlike the city, the library board doesn’t have other sources of tax revenue, beyond the property tax, to draw upon.

In voting for the switch based on applying the library’s existing line item budget to the current equalized assessed valuation, the board was assuming it could — if it chose — increase library spending by as much as 80 percent before hitting the state-imposed tax cap.

But how much head room it will actually end up with apparently won’t be known for some time yet.
 

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. Decision will backfire

    It seems to me that the library board is cutting off it’s nose to spite it’s face. While having their own tax levy may make them independent of City Council decision-making, it will also cut it off from City services that they rely on. Does the library board or staff have any idea of the costs involved in providing their own payroll, HR, legal representation and IT? They’ve already lost services because of the dismantling of the North Suburban Library System. Can this really all be to save the library branches? It doesn’t seem to me that the library board has done due diligence with regards to possible alternative solutions to providing sufficient funds prior to this vote, nor have they sufficiently explored the potential downsides to this decision.

    I am concerned that Evanston is on a slippery slope to becoming a much smaller, less diverse community where only the rich can afford to live. Of course, I don’t know who those of us who live in modest homes with ridiculously high property taxes will be able to sell them to.

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published.