1571-maple-highlighted-gmap

An ordinance that would approve a 12-story planned development at 1571 Maple Ave. was introduced on a 6-1 vote at the Evanston City Council Monday night.

With two aldermen absent from the meeting, the council postponed a final debate on the project until its March 23 meeting.

At the Planning and Development Committee meeting earlier Monday evening, several residents of the One Evanston condo tower at 1570 Elmwood Ave.,  just south of the new project site, continued to oppose the new project, citing arguments about the height of the new building and whether it complies with city planning and zoning documents.

Despite those arguments, the development won unanimous approval from the city’s Plan Commission in January after a series of four hearings.

A rendering looking west from Elmwood Avenue, showing the 1570 Elmwood building on the left and the planned new building to its right.

Bernard Citron, an attorney for developer Centrum Partners LLC, said the project had been designed to minimize its impact on One Evanston by orienting the new tower on a north-south axis, while One Evanston’s tower is oriented east-west, and that the two towers would be 50 feet apart.

The developers have agreed to lease 101 parking spaces in the city’s Maple Avenue garage, two blocks north of the building site and not rent to tenants with cars if all those spaces are filled.

Citron said the developers are taking a risk by having the parking off site, but that they’re convinced most tenants in the building, just a block from downtown Evanston’s two mass transit stations, won’t have cars.

Alderman Judy Fiske, 1st Ward.

Alderman Judy Fiske, 1st Ward, cast the only vote against the proposal Monday night. She said she doesn’t believe the plan provides sufficient parking for the development, which will include 21 convertible, 36 one-bedroom, 38 two-bedroom and six three-bedroom units.

Alderman Don Wilson, 4th Ward.

Alderman Don Wilson, whose 4th Ward includes the site, voted to introduce the proposal, but cautioned that that was not the final vote on the project — without specifying whether he is inclined to ultimately vote to approve it.

Alderman Ann Rainey, 8th Ward, said the city built the Maple Avenue garage decades ago “to assist development in the area.”

She said she believes leasing spaces in the garage for the new development “is perfect for it.”

The area immediately around the garage is now almost completely built up, Rainey said, while the 1,400-car garage now is on average only half occupied.

A simple majority vote of the the council is required to approve a planned development.

Related story

Maple development tests parking theories

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation

5 Comments

  1. Rainey’s Statement is not correct

    The area immediately around the garage is now almost completely built up, Rainey said, while the 1,400-car garage now is on average only half occupied. –   to the North is a large piece of property NU is using for surface parking, if this area were developed, it would appear the developers would want to use the Maple ave garage.  Given Rainey lives in south Evanston she may not ever come to this area of town.

    It appears the city is giving away our assets once again, by leasing this – it should require the developer to purchase the spaces at a much higher cost, stop giving developers and the council members pet project our money!!!

    1. I would bet that she comes to

      I would bet that she comes to that parking lot quite a bit in the summer since NU lets the city hold the farmers market there. If they build an (off the tax roll anyway) building there insead of maintaining it as a surface lot there would not be a place down town to have the farmers market. Not sure how that land is relevent to this story….

       

      1. Relevance

        The Land is quite relevent, if you are selling off parking 2 blocks away, and you have land that could be developed right next to the garage, with a tall building, maybe should not be leasing the parking at a bargin price.  I think Rainey and the rest of them rather than "Mashing up' with NU should be asking them to put this property back on the tax roles, versus all the phony economic development she is part of on Howard Street.

        1. not relevant

          Disagree, this land you reference is completely irrelevant to the project under discussion. So are your comments stating how an alderman will probably never visit downtown.

          The garage has enough capacity to accomodate the building of several more projects downtown, including the lot you demand be constructed upon, no problem.   

          P.S. Community notice.  Saturday a new restaurant, I think a vegetarian one called the Kale Lunch Counter, will open in previously vacant space at 741 Howard.  Welcome to Evanston Kale Counter! 

    2. Parking requirement when building

      I and others I've mentioned the building to, were of the understanding that for many years any new building had to have at least one parking spot for each unit on/in the building property.

      I recall many buildings being held up until such parking could be incorporated.

      Have zoning laws changed or is the city making an exception, given they want money from the apparently under-used Maple garage ?

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published.