Aldermen reversed their acceptance of four police emergency blue-light phones from Northwestern University Monday after a half dozen neighbors voiced fears at the council meeting that the phones would brand their blocks as high crime areas.

Phone box

A blue-light phone box outside a university building at Maple Avenue and Clark Street.

Real estate agent Carolyn Smith of 2118 Orrington Ave. said she’s had potential home buyers looking at a property across from a university dorm see the blue light phone there and raise questions about whether it’s a high crime neighborhood.

Attorney David Schoenfeld of 2039 Orrington Ave. said he was concerned about the cost, appearance and stigmatizing effect of the phones.

He claimed “the main purpose of blue lights is to satisfy concerns of parents of prospective students,” and added that by accepting the phones the city “may be agreeing to fund a marketing effort for NU in perpetuity that’s of no benefit to the neighbors.”

Jeanne Lindwall of 625 Library Place said the phones had been discussed periodically over the past couple of years, but the proposals had always been for phones at CTA stations and along the lakefront, but suddently, she said, the plan was shifted to include phones in residential neighborhoods without seeking any input from neighbors.

But Kate Pascale of NU’s student government organization said the phones “are of great value to students.” She argued that “the lights are a deterrent to crime.”

In response to claims by some neighbors that the prevelence of cell phones today makes the blue light phones irrelevant, several speakers backing the emergency call boxes said that cell phones are often stolen by robbers, leaving victims with no other easy way to summons help.

Alderman Edmund Moran, 6th Ward, who chairs the 911 committee that recommended the phone plan to the council, said a number of the phones already are located at university buildings in city neighborhoods “and I’d never heard a single person complain about them before tonight.”

“There is crime in my ward, in every single ward in this city,” Moran added, “and for anybody to suggest that public safety and deterrence of crime in this neighborhood is irrelevant — they’re wrong.”

“These students are living in Evanston. They are our residents, our citizens. And I think they’re entitled to protection,” he said.

Moran said the city would have insurance coverage to protect it against potential liability issues regarding the phones, “and it probably won’t cost us a cent” beyond what is already charged for liability coverage on the existing 911 system.

Moran and Alderman Delores Holmes, 5th Ward, voted against the reconsideration motion.

Alderman Cheryl Wollin, 1st Ward, who represents areas proposed for the phones, said she “strongly feels that blue lights are a deterrent to crime.”

“Lets not pretend they are a stigma” or would inaccurately imply a crime problem, Wollin said, “because, friends, we do have a crime problem in this community.”

But Wollin, who voted for the reconsideration motion, said she was happy to talk further about locations for the phones.

The aldermen voted to proceed with plans to install a total of five phones at four CTA stations from Davis Street to Central Street.

The street-corner boxes would have been located at the intersections of Sherman Avenue and Elgin Road, Sherman Avenue and Hamlin Street, Maple Avenue and Simpson Street, and Orrington Avenue and Noyes Street.

Under the plan the university had agreed to pay to purchase and install the phones while the city would pick up maintenance costs and respond to emergency calls placed from the phones.

Related story

Emergency call boxes approved – Oct. 23

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

  1. Crime in our neighborhoods?
    Yes, it’s true we have crime in our community. But we also have diversity in our community. You can’t have your cake and eat it too.

    1. Excommunication, Extraction, Extermination
      What is your point?

      Diverse communities equate to increased crime?

      What “brand” should we annihilate and remove so you’ll feel secure?

      The scope and effect of social and economic disorder is bigger than the confines found within tiny, miniscule, little, itty bitty Evanston.

      Run, I say: FLEE – – but you can’t hide from our nation’s realities.

  2. because, friends, we do have a crime problem in this community.”
    I think Alderperson Wollins comment was the first time I have heard a council member admit we have a crime problem here. They love to pretend we do not –

    Is there any real solution to the problem – yes and no – they council does not have any solution -blue lights will have no effect – the kids who have been attacking people and robbing people will not be stopped by a blue light – they will just beat the person to the ground so they can not use the blue light.

    The problem is we have a criminal element that lives here until we decide we do not want these people here -then there is no answer. Ofcourse there is no easy way to get rid of those committing crime here -3 alderperson went to see a judge in skokie did they come back with any solution? Because the court keeps on letting them go.

    Yes – if you want to rid the community of crime – there is a simple solution that is discourage any poor people from living here – and the crime rate will drop – but our council members are not about to create policy that does that – since it just is to unpleasant to admit that they have failed to make the community work and the policy of “diversity”.

    I think they would rather pretend that the police will protect us – rather than getting rid of those who commit crime.

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published.