An Evanston Plan Commission hearing on a proposed Chase Bank branch was postponed Wednesday night after a neighbor complained that the city hadn’t properly followed its rules for notifying neighbors of the plan.

Joshua Huppert whose home at 2630 Crawford Ave. is across the street from the proposed bank site at the intersection of Crawford and Gross Point Road, said the notice of the proposed zoning change should have been sent to property owners living within 500 feet of either of the two lots the developers want to use for the bank.

Instead, a now former city staffer sent notices only to people living within 500 feet of the lot on the corner.

Another neighbor said that meant at least a few people living in townhomes on Prospect Avenue didn’t get the notices, even though they were within 500 feet of some portion of the site.

The proposal has been under review by the Plan Commission for several months and has been the subject of other public meetings dating back to last October and the notice had been published in a weekly newspaper and posted on signs on the property.

That led Ken Cox, an assistant city attorney, to argue that the failure to reach all the neighbors should be ignored, because of a provision in the city code that “failure of delivery” of the notice isn’t grounds for invalidating a zoning amendment.

But the commissioners concluded that failure to mail the notices wasn’t the same as failure to have them successfully delivered — and so they voted to postpone the hearing until 7 p.m. June 20.

Related story

Bank developer shrinks planned NW Evanston site

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. Zoning, Evanston, and mistakes

    It is absolutely amazing that once again a mistake is made on a zoning related issue. For a town as large as Evanston and whose community is as sophisticated as it is (home to one of the best universities in the country) the staff is incompetent at best.

    Every time I have ventured into Evanston for a development project, the staff has made a mistake. One included advising a developer not once but three times as to the zoning of a property and it was the wrong answer all three times. 

    On the other hand, here the village attorney was correct.  If the person to whom notice should have been sent appeared at the hearing, he waived his objection to notice.

    Notice is just that. To assure the right of neighbors to be heard. If someone shows up and speaks, then the purpose for which notice would have been sent has been met.  Also if the original notice for the larger project included all, then no new notice would be required for subsequent meetings for the smaller project.

    The meetings can and should be treated as continued meetings. So long as the property shrunk and did not grow in size, the notice complaint was neither correct nor relevant. 

    Once more, progress in Evanston is tied up in process and not the actual issues.  Typical. One of the reasons taxes in Evanston are as high as they are. 


Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *