howard-handlerimg_0238

Going on three years after controversy erupted over city rules limiting to three the number of unrelated persons who can occupy a housing unit — a plan to reform the rules will be addressed by the Plan Commission this summer.

Howard Handler of the Realtors’ group speaks to aldermen Tuesday night.

Going on three years after controversy erupted over city rules limiting to three the number of unrelated persons who can occupy a housing unit — a plan to reform the rules will be addressed by the Plan Commission this summer.

Evanston aldermen in the city’s Planning and Development Committee Tuesday night voted to send a rewrite of the rules developed by Alderman Don Wilson, 4th Ward, to the Plan Commission for further study.

The action came after Howard Handler, representing the North Shore Barrington Association of Realtors suggested that the new rules should make no distinction between occupancy limits for unrelated and related persons.

Handler said the current rules adversely affect housing choice and affordability as well as access to school, jobs, recreation and other services.

Under Wilson’s plan up to six unrelated individuals could share an apartment in multi-family zoning districts, but only if the city’s zoning administrator certified that the unit had at least the same number of legal bedrooms as the proposed number of occupants.

Handler said he doubted the need for a formal approval process, and said that if there is to be one, landlords shouldn’t have to reapply for certification year after year.

He also objected to limits in Wilson’s plan that would forbid unrelated persons from sharing a bedroom in multi-family housing districts. And he noted that under the proposed rules related or unrelated persons could share bedrooms in single-family housing zones.

The occupancy limits had drawn support from some homeowners living near the Northwestern University campus concerned about noise and other student housing issues.

They’ve drawn intense opposition from NU students, who said they needed to double up in apartments to be able to afford the rent on apartments near the campus, especially after city officials said they planned to start enforcing the rules — which had gone largely unenforced for years.

The issue also became entangled in so-far-unsuccessful efforts to require licensing of Evanston rental apartments.

The draft ordinance developed by Wilson would also create four different categories of “families” that could form a single houskeeping unit in a dwelling unit:

  • Type A — One or more persons related by blood, marriage or adoption.
  • Type B — Two unrelated persons and their children.
  • Type C — Not more than four unrelated persons (an increase from the current limit of three).
  • Type D — A congregate living arrangement for persons affiliated with a bona-fide non-profit organized for religious purposes, with a limit of no more than two persons per bedroom.

The ordinance would also permit a Type A or B family to have up to two servants, roomers or permanent guests, provided the dwelling unit was larger than 1,000 square feet.

Related stories

Evanston aldermen to discuss occupancy limits (5/28/13)

Council kicks rental licensing back to staff (10/9/12)

Rental licensing heads back to Evanston council (6/1`5/12)

Prof: Evanston’s ‘brothel’ law unnecessary (11/2/11)

Landlords call for occupancy limit reform (2/1/11)

Code puts hundreds of apartments off limits to students (1/31/11)

City: 3 students good, 4 bad (1/26/11)

Apartment occupancy limit questioned (10/29/10)

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

  1. NIMBYs should stay out of people’s bedrooms

    "He also objected to limits in Wilson's plan that would forbid unrelated persons from sharing a bedroom in multi-family housing districts. And he noted that under the proposed rules related or unrelated persons could share bedrooms in single-family housing zones."

    Don't these busybody NIMBYs have more important things to worry about ?  It's amazing that our aldermen are wasting time making it illegal for unrelated people to share a bedroom.

  2. Enforcement will only be in the First Ward

    If this ordinance is passed I would like to see the statistics of how and when it is enforced in every ward in Evanston.  I am sure that the Eight and Fifth wards will not be touched by this occupancy limit.

  3. Accolades due.

    While this article accurately portrays the position of the North Shore – Barrington Association of REALTORS (NSBAR) — that occupancy standards should be identical for related and unrelated persons — we believe Ald. Wilson's proposal is great step in the right direction and applaud his effort to reform this antiquated, hurtful policy.  We look forward to working with him and the Council in shaping the final product. 

    Howard Handler
    Government Affairs Director
    North Shore – Barrington Assoc. of REALTORS 

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *