An Evanston City Council committee has approved new inspection fees for farmers market vendors, despite complaints that the fees would discourage vendors from participating in the markets.

The new annual fee schedule for vendors ranges from  $125 for low risk foods — prepackaged items prepared in a commercial facility — to $275 for high-risk foods that require extensive handling or have been implicated in food-borne illness outbreaks or recalls.

Those high-risk items range from meat, poultry and fish to honey and apple cider.

The city currently charges a fee for each vendor at each market location, ranging from $75 to $225. The new fee schedule would let vendors pay a single fee and operate at as many events in the city as they chose.

Vendors selling fresh, uncut, whole, unprocessed fruits and vegetables would be exempt from the fee requirement as would those who qualify for a “cottage food” license under a new state law.

Vendors selling at a one-day event could either apply for a temporary food permit fee for $105, or apply for one of the annual licenses.

Frank Jeffers, of 613 Sheridan Road, from the group Friends of Evanston Farmers Markets,  told the Human Services Committee Monday night that many vendors “simply can’t afford the high public health fees for local winter markets.”

And he complained that the one-day fee for a small scale farmers market was unfair when the same fee would be charged to vendors at much larger events, like the Custer Fair.

He also noted that the city had waived fees for winter markets last year.

Top: Frank Jeffers of Friends of Evanston Farmers Markets. Above: City Manager Wally Bobkiewicz.

But City Manager Wally Bobkiewicz said the fees were designed to recover the costs of having city health department workers conduct the inspections.

Alderman Delores Holmes, 5th Ward, said, “For me it’s all about safety.”
She said she supports farmers markets but wants to make sure they are properly inspected so people don’t get sick, and that the cost of those inspections is paid for.

Bobkiewicz said the proposed fees wouldn’t fully recover the cost of inspections, but do cover much of the cost.

“It’s a policy question,” he added, “how much do you wish to recover of the cost associated with the work.”

The committee approved the new fee schedule on a 5-0 vote. The measure now goes to the full City Council for approval.

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation


  1. City must accept liability

    If the City of Evanston is going to impose "inspection costs,", then they must accept liability if inspected food is contaminated and sold to a consumer following this inspection. Is the city ready to accept possible legal costs of sold food that may be contaminated?

    1. Very reasonable

      The city has no liability on that whatsoever.  It is no different than the inspections they do at any restaurant in town.  It is an inspection of "best practices" to insure food is being handled properly, stored at safe temperatures, etc. 

      Fact is, you cannot tell if food is contaminated by appearance, or smell, or any other such means.  You can only reduce risk by making sure that best practices are in place, especially in an open air environment where there are no coolers, handwashing facilities, etc.

      I have heard what I will call "localvores" say that the products there have no possible way to make people ill because the product is "local" or "organic" or whatever.  That simple statement was proof of ignorance and that oversight is needed and they should, like every other business, cover the direct cost of that oversight.

  2. City inspector actions at Farmers market – a major issue?

    Mr Jeffers brought up an interesting issue, when he spoke, which I then questioned the committee about.

    Mr Jeffers stated that the city inspectors at the farmers market were taking cash from the vendors as inspection fees.  When I raised the question, to the committee it was stated from staff – they do not take fees, at the Market but they are paid upfront. 

    The council, and Wally owe us a explaination of what is going on here, there appears to be many problems with this. Wally needs to undertake a complete review of the practices of this city department, Wally needs to show a complete accounting of all the fees collected at the Farmers market by the city,

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *