jane-grover-img_0834

Evanston’s Human Services Committee Monday night rejected a subcommittee’s recommendation that the city stop using the Community Animal Rescue Effort to help manage the city’s animal shelter.

Instead the panel voted, on a motion from Alderman Jane Grover, 7th Ward, to have city staff prepare a set of specifications for how the city wants the shelter run and then ask CARE leaders whether they’re willing to operate in accord with those guidelines.

Both members of the subcommittee, aldermen Judy Fiske, 1st Ward, and Mark Tendam, 6th Ward, voted against the proposal, but it carried on a 4-2 vote. Fiske failed to persuade others to join in her suggestion that the city immediately seek proposals from other animal welfare groups to run the shelter.

The new guidelines are to be discussed at a special Human Services Committee meeting at 6 p.m. March 31, and are then scheduled for adoption at the committee’s regular meeting a week later.

The dispute has centered around CARE’s practices in evaluating the behavior of dogs to determine whether they should be euthanized.

Animal Warden Linda Teckler.

While the city’s chief animal warden, Linda Teckler, has always made the final decision about euthanasia, Teckler conceded that — until dissident CARE volunteers raised the concerns about CARE’s practices — she’d heavily relied on the group’s recommendations.

Police Chief Richard Eddington said the department has now stopped euthanizing dogs — “but somebody has to evaluate the dogs.”

“At the center of the controversy,” Eddington said,”is CARE’s unwillingness to modify that evaluation process.”

“There has been more than ample time for them to do so,” Eddington added, “and there seems to be an unwillingness to deviate from the current path they’re on”

“I don’t know that the relationship” between CARE and the city “is repairable,” he said.

“I’m not the money guy, but operationally the chief animal warden and her helpers and a core of volunteers can maintain operations at the shelter if we suspend our agreement with CARE,” the chief added.

CARE President Linda Gelb.

Linda Gelb, who has been president of CARE for 23 years, said critics have been unclear and inconsistent in their demands.

“We don’t know what you want,” Gelb said, “it’s gone from euthanasia to replacing the board of CARE.”

Gelb voiced fears about liability risks to the group and the city if an animal approved for adoption later bit and seriously injured someone.

“I’d be mortified if one of our dogs hurt someone,” Gelb said, adding that, even so “we adopt out a lot of pit bulls and try to make sure that they are ambassadors for the breed so we don’t hear that one of CARE’s dogs injured somebody.”

Alderman Judy Fiske.

Asked by Alderman Fiske why the group has recently removed “Evanston” from its name, Gelb said CARE has been working on rebranding itself for the last three years.

“We’re talking about expanding to the entire North Shore, not just Evanston,” Gelb said, adding that the group eventually hopes to set up its own separate facility outside of Evanston, since the city only allows animals from Evanston to be held at the shelter.

“We are an independent organization and we want to be able to operate a little more independently,” Gelb said.

Related stories

Animal shelter dispute back to committee (3/3/14)

Panel would kick CARE to the curb (2/19/14)

Dog lovers snap at each other (2/4/1$)

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

  1. CARE takes “Evanston” out of their name

    CARE has offered nothing but opposition to changing their methods and we've given them another chance even though the CITY WARDEN could do the job along with the core volunteers.  Evanston leaders, there is something seriously wrong in the thought process that leads you to make your decisions.  CARE should be ousted from our animal shelter today!

    It is concerning that CARE wants to expand their practices along the north shore… so they've removed Evanston from their name and are rebranding themselves.  A more legitimate scenario for the rebranding?  With the reported other rescue groups that are coming in to rescue dogs from Evanston's Animal Shelter run by CARE, it is far more likely they have been recognized as a group that is more apt to kill than save.  CARE NEEDS to rebrand so they can distance themselves from the all too valid reputation they have created with their overly stringent euthanasia practices. 

    We have donated to Evanston Animal Shelter every year for at least 15 years.  We have taken our dogs to their dog washes to help them generate funds.  NO MORE.  We will never give CARE another dime in hopes that they will be revenue starved out of existence.

    Evanston – aka Heavenston…. for homeless cats and dogs.

  2. What does it take?

    What does it take for the elected officials of Evanston to regain control of the city's municipal shelter?  It is not clear to me how CARE ever gained control over the facility in the way that they have and it is even less clear, now that all of the issues have been made public, how the city would allow this to continue.  There are so many issues, from the euthanasia rate for dogs, to the money, to documents that they won't share with the city.  I've watched the videos and listented to the tapes of the subcommittee meetings and it is impossible to listen to those conversations and feel that there is any way the leadership of CARE is going to change their ways and take this shelter in a new direction.  They have changed their name to remove any reference to the City of Evanston and yet they somehow feel they have a right to continue to operate free of charge out of the city's shelter and continue to accept donations "for the animals" while padding their bank account?   

    And I'd like to understand Jane Grover's motivation for advocating for this organization.  It just makes no sense to me and I am appalled by the whole mess.  

     

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published.