melissa-wynne-20200220-img_9778

City staff and members of two city boards debated how strongly to ascribe differences in neighborhood environmental quality measures to racial discrimination during an Evanston Civic Center meeting Thursday evening.

Alderman Melissa Wynne, 3rd Ward, suggested there should be “more recognition of the negative disparate impact on communities” and that “not all neighborhoods received the same attention on environmental issues” in a resolution the Environment Board and the Equity and Empowerment Commission hope to send to City Council for adoption later this year.

But Acting Assistant City Manager Kimberly Richardson said she “was triggered by” wording in an earlier draft of the resolution that made it sound like all people of color live in areas that have environmental issues.

“It made it sound like all our black or Hispanic residents are living in areas that are desperate,” Richardson said.

Former 5th Ward Alderman Delores Holmes argued that there was racial discrimination in that two landfills to the south of her ward were turned into what now are James Park and Robert Crown Park, while a trash transfer station in her ward is still operating.

City efforts to close the transfer station have been blocked because it has a state license that the city lacks the power to overturn.


Alejandra Ibañez.

Alejandra Ibañez of the Equity and Empowerment Commission suggested the resolution should be broadened to call for protection of not just residents but all “stakeholders.”

She also called for more emphasis on how both communities of color and working class communities have been impacted by environmental policy decisions.

City staff promised to rework the language in the draft resolution in time for the groups to vote on the proposal at their next meetings, which, at least in the case of the Equity and Empowerment Commisison, won’t take place until April.

Related story

Environmental justice resolution up for debate (2/18/20)

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

  1.  Priorities

    Instead of working on solving the pension/debt problem, instead of working on expanding the commercial tax base, instead of ensuring proper police/fire/sanitation services, they tackle this.

  2. Oscar the Grouch

    2 more thoughts…

    Where should the trash go?  Whereever it goes, it is trash.  Living near the trash has correspondingly lower property values. Economics 101.

    Has the air and drinking water in residential areas near the trash transfer station been deemed dangerous?  Is the quailty of the water the same for all Evanstonians?

    1. Transfer station

      You only need to walk through the area near the transfer station on a warm summer day to be aware of the unpleasant odors the station sometimes spreads through the neighborhood.

      And neighbors frequently complain of problems with rats.

      The final report of a recent air quality monitoring study regarding the transfer station has not yet been released.

      — Bill

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published.