Evanston’s Plan Commission Wednesday night narrowly approved a zoning change requested by aldermen that would loosen restrictions on coach house rentals.

The change would remove a current city rule that says such accessory dwelling units can only be occupied by members of the family or household staff of the family that occupies the main dwelling unit on the property.

Advocates of the change see it as a way to increase the supply of affordable housing in the city.

Commissioner Andrew Pigozzi, who opposed the change, said, “This is a game changer. If I have a single family house with a garage I can tear it down, build a new one and have an apartment above it.”

Scott Mangam, the city’s zoning administrator, responded that he could do that now — the only change would be that the coach house could be rented out to a non-family member.

All other city rules that set lot coverage and other restrictions on new construction and density would remain in place.

The city’s enforcement of the coach house occupancy rule is complaint-driven, Mangum said. And staff at the meeting indicated they had no tally of how many complaints have been received — or for that matter a clear count of how many coach houses exist in the city.

In effect, as long as a homeowner maintains good relations with neighbors, he or she may be able to get away with violating the existing restriction. Some property owners have also been reported to ask coach house tenants to perform occasional baby-sitting or other tasks to make them qualify as a “household worker.”

The requested zoning change was recorded as being approved on a 4-3 vote.

It now goes back to the City Council for potential adoption into the city code.

Update 3/16/18: While the vote was announced as a 4-3 split, Zoning Administrator Scott Mangum has since acknowledged that he mis-tallied the votes and the Commission actually tied 4-4 on the issue, which means the proposal will advance to the City Council without a recommendation from the Commission.

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation


  1. Unenforceable

    The City doesn’t have the time, direction, or resources to enforce the existing law. Furthermore, the current law forces homeowners to lie about rentals occupied by non-family members. This is never good. Fix the regulation and bring all rental housing out of the shadows. Ultimately the code is meant to provide safe living conditions for all.

  2. If the city was truly
    If the city was truly commited to affordable housing they would remove the restrictions around coach house and loosen the onea around square footage per unit and land requirement per unit so home owner can have smaller dwelling if they wish to. But no.. We want our pretty mansions right by public transportation…

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *