Evanston’s Utilities Commission wants the city to force owners of large buildings to report their energy usage to the city in an effort to encourage them to cut energy consumption.

The building energy benchmarking concept was advanced at Monday night’s City Council meeting by Commission Chair Richard Lanyon, who said it’s modeled on programs already adopted in about 10 cities across the country.

Chicago aldermen adopted a benchmarking ordinance on a 32-17 vote in Sept. 2013, over the objections of opponents who said it would result in “public shaming” that would harm struggling building owners in a competitive marketplace 

In his presentation to aldermen, Lanyon said commercial buildings account for about 56 percent of greenhouse gas emissions in Evanston and reducing their energy usage is vital to meeting the city’s climate action plan goals.

Evanston in 2010 adopted a green building ordinance setting energy efficiency standards for new construction in the city, and he said now it’s time to bring existing buildings into the process.

So far the Utilities Commission has been working only with city staff and groups like the city’s Environment Board and Citizens Greener Evanston to develop the proposal. But Lanyon said he now wanted to discuss it with the Chamber of Commerce, large building owners and other stakeholders.

The Chicago ordinance only applies to buildings larger than 50,000 square feet. While those building account for less than 1 percent of the total building stock, Chicago officials say they account for 22 percent of all building-based energy usage.

With no ordinance yet drafted for Evanston, the details of how many buildings would be affected here were unclear.

Alderman Ann Rainey, 8th Ward, said the plan was “one of those regulations that freaks out owners of buildings.”

The Building Owners and Managers Association International has adopted a policy statement opposing mandatory benchmarking programs, but says it supports voluntary benchmarking using the EPA’s Energy Star Portfolio Manager platform or similar programs.

The benchmarking plan was presented to aldermen as a discussion item and no vote was taken on it.

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation


  1. Let the City do their own Buildings first!

    The Mayor thought this was  a great idea!  I would suggest if its such a good idea the sustainabilty Coordinator, do the work on all the city buildings first, as a pilot.  Please don't hire an expensive consultant, at our expense, since this is easy.  After a year or two with not results, it will be forgotten.

    By the way what does this tell you? Not much other than the building meets one of three criteria.

    The utilitiy commission should be more interested in more important items, such as the operation of the water plant. Maybe they might have an opinion on the fact the 30 inch water line running down Sherman needs replaced and the city has not planned the work, which has a very high potential for a major problem.


  2. I don’t own a building

    but it is time for Evanston to start keeping their nose out of private property owners business. Why doesn't the city put boxes in every building that will send the energy use back to city hall. The mayor can become useful hinding out fines or arresting folks that provide way to much heat to their renters.

    Like the last 6 years in Washington, make life more expensive for the citizens, while eliminating the right to privacy.

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published.