Evanston residents offered sharply differing views at a public meeting this evening about the merits of ordinances to ban or tax disposable shopping bags.
Todd Ruppenthal (pictured above), owner of the Happy Husky Bakery and president of the Central Street Business Association, said the best ordinance would be no ordinance at all.
He said even an extra charge for bags of a few pennies would anger shoppers and cause them to avoid shopping in Evanston.
He suggested the city should focus on educational efforts and incentives for creating a greener and more ecologically conscious city.
“Using the carrot instead of the hammer is always the best choice, for both consumers and businesses,” Ruppenthal said.
Alderman Peter Braithwaite, 2nd Ward talks with business owner and environmental activist Dick Peach and Chamber of Commerce President Dan Mennemeyer.
A large number of business owners and environmental activists — in some cases business owners who are also environmental activists — turned out for the session.
Speakers who summarized the results of small group discussions during the meeting saw positive potental effects for a ban — ranging from fewer plastic bags stuck in trees to potential reduced trash collection costs.
One speaker said a ban would “create continuing prestige for Evanston.”
“The goal is to modify behavior,” he said, so a ban combined with an education campaign “is the best way to go.”
Another said, “You have no right to have a plastic bag. We need to do something radical.”
But other speakers suggested a ban would create complaints about “Big Brother in the grocery store” and said a tax or ban would be punishing to small businesses and tend to drive them out of Evanston.
Paul Giddings, co-owner of the Folkworks Gallery and a leader of the Chicago Dempster Merchants Association, said his table discussed eliminating just the cheapest plastic bags, but allowing more expensive ones.
That, the theory went, would encourage people to switch to paper bags that are more frequently recycled.
Several representatives of industry groups also spoke.
Mike Sullivan of Hilex Poly, said his firm operates the largest plastic bag recycling plant in the world in North Vernon, Ind. He argued that the solution to the bag problem is a comprehensive recycling program.
He urged support for SB102 in the state legislature which he said would promote bag recycling and create a lot of green jobs.
Patrick Rita of the Renewable Bag Council, which represents manufacturers of brown paper bags, said the city should not tax or ban paper bags because the industry is a leader in waste recovery and recycling.
He also claimed that rather than “saving trees,” bag bans would lead tree-farm owners to shift to row-crop agriculture instead.
City Manager Wally Bobkiewicz said staff would return to the City Council’s Administration and Public Works Committee meeting on June 13 with a revised proposal for how to handle the bag issue.
What about bags made of corn that decompose
There are bags made of corn that decompose in landfills.
I doubt that was discussed at the meeting or brought up by those pushing for a bag ban.
This the wrong time to even consider banning or taxing plastic and paper bags. We are in a severe recession and the last thing the mayor and City Council should be doing is expounding all this energy on more regulations.
Windmills, banning bags and LEED requirements of businesses over 10,000 square feet are all products of an active and powerful local green movement that is hurting existing and potential commercial tax revenue.
Our Evanston government in a short span of time has created a reputation as anti-business in the most possible worst time.
The bag controversy
Everything exists within a context. The bag concern exists within the current economic condition in Evanston. This concern seems to have arisen in response to a few loud voices, much like the refusal to grant a license to the "Tilted Kilt" action was in response to a few loud voices.
Evanston needs to focus on the bigger picture of government and spend it's energy on two things: Making money and saving money.
Will passing this legislation make money for the city?
Will passing this legislation save money for the city?
How much of each?
With money you have choice. Without it, you don't.
The city needs to have it's coffers filled and assured of being filled without taxing it's citizens further.
How about a ban on unsolicited “values” flyers?
A really huge source of needless waste is unsolicited advertising flyers. I don't know how many times I've called Trib over the past many months to beg them to stop delivery. It seems every time I ask them to stop delivery they send more.
Last week I found 4 flyers wrapped in green plastic on my doorstep. Countless times I come home after a few days away to find I have to wade through advertising flyers, door hangers, brochures, etc etc etc piled up on my doorstep, hanging from the doorknob, or stuck between the slats of my fence. What better way to say "no one's home"?
One recent very windy Saturday morning I saw dozens of Triblocal Values flyers in their ugly green plastic sleeves flying down Lincoln Avenue. It's ridiculous! Other states allow homeowners to opt out of having unsolicited door-to-door delivery of advertising. Why can't we?
It's also a security issue. I pay a lot of money for a security service but I actually have to hire someone while I'm away to make sure my front porch is clear of advertising clutter. I'm sure I'm not the only person in town with this problem.
Leave a comment