It’s time to revamp how Evanston aldermen are paid.


Aldermen currently receive nearly $13,000 a year in cash compensation and are eligible to receive city health insurance benefits with a value of up to an additional $22,000.

So the total financial benefit aldermen receive for their service varies radically depending on whether they opt for health coverage and what plan they choose from among the several the city offers.

The latest city salary report shows the total budgeted compensation of individual aldermen varies from a low of $13,762 for Alderman Brian Miller, 9th Ward, who hasn’t opted for health coverage, to $34,615 each for Aldermen Melissa Wynne, 3rd Ward, and Don Wilson, 4th Ward, who’ve opted for the most expensive full family health coverage the city offers.

Such a huge disparity in total compensation is simply unfair. And it can create perverse incentives to make decisions that raise costs for taxpayers.

Consider a hypothetical married alderman who has access to health insurance coverage through his or her own full-time non-aldermanic job and through a spouse’s full-time job.

The Kaiser Family Foundation Employer Health Benefits Survey found last year that on average employees had to contribute 28 percent toward the cost of their employer-sponsored health benefits.

So let’s say a hypothetical alderman has a choice of opting for health coverage through a spouse’s plan that would require a 30 percent employee match, through his or her own somewhat more generous private employer plan that would require a 25 percent match — or through the city’s health plan that requires only a 10 percent payment.

Which plan do you think the alderman will choose? Obviously, any economically rational alderman will opt to stick the taxpayers with their health insurance costs.

So, our part-time aldermen should receive the same total compensation regardless of their health plan choice — but should have the option, as city retirees do, of buying into the city’s health plan by paying the full premium themselves.

Let’s imagine the baseline for determining the new total compensation level was set at the second highest-cost health plan option any alderman now chooses plus the current aldermanic cash compensation.

That would make the baseline pay for aldermen $31,350 a year — a stipend surely high enough to attract highly qualified candidates for a job that at least one alderman reports can be accomplished in 10 to 20 hours a week.

And it would end the bizarre situation in which taxpayers shell out more than twice as much in total compensation costs for some alderman than others.

Seven of nine aldermen would have more total compensation under such a plan — ranging from a few hundred to more than $17,000 a year.

And it would make service as an alderman more financially attractive to a range of Evanstonians — from retirees who are covered by Medicare to young singles who don’t need a family health plan.

It would also encourage aldermen with families who have access to health coverage through outside employment to use that benefit.

And it would impose no net burden on aldermen with families without access to insurance through other employers — as long as they opted for one of the city’s less expensive family coverage plans.

It would represent a 27 percent increase in total compensation costs for aldermen over what they’re costing taxpayers this year — but leveling the playing field to attract a more diverse range of candidates for the job is arguably worth that.

Reducing the baseline total compensation level could minimize or eliminate the cost increase for taxpayers — but it seems impractical to suggest that a majority of aldermen would vote for a plan that would lower their own total compensation.

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation


  1. Why not go Canadian?

    Speaking of health insurance, I'm waiting for one of our more liberal council members to propose that the city cover all of it's residents with free medical insurance if they use St. Francis or Evanston Hospital and their affiliated medical staff. At 90% coverage. they could reason. that what's good enough for them should be good enough for all. And how to pay for it? By picking Evanston's money tree of course !

    1. No more pay raises!!!!!
      You are exactly right…these liberal overpaid Evanston Aldermen want extra money to cover Obamacare just like Obama, Congress, teachers Unions, UAW etc. They all vote for it, force it on us and then want exemptions or money to cover it while the rest of us go broke.

      It’s time for Liberals to eat the same dog food they have forced on the rest of us. My 24000 ZeroCare cost is already coming 100% out of the Evanston economy. I closed my storage garage, cut all expenses, dumped UAW car etc. US middle class has not had a raise in 16 years while US Government has doubled in size.

      Time for the IL citizens to go on strike against the overpaid hypocrites in the public sector.

      No wonder Illinois has #1 debt in US debt and is #1 worst return on taxes paid.

  2. Part-time job
    These people have part-time positions. They should not receive benefits at all. As for pay increases, there should be a referendum to determine if salaries should increase.

  3. Part-Time
    First, I am sorry that aldermanic hours worked survey is anonymous.
    I wouldn’t want to live in the ward where my alderman says they can accomplish all they need to accomplish in 20 hours or less a week.
    Second, it’s bizarre that this is a part time job.
    I think the discussions about consolidating down to 6 wards, making the position full time, makes Mr. Smith’s suggestion much more palatable.
    I know we live in a state where our state legislators are paid north of $60k a year for “part time” jobs, but Evanston doesn’t need to participate in typical Illinois shenanigans.
    At that point, we can talk about other good government changes that need to be made (looking at you, school district consolidation) but that’s a whole other rant.

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published.