Electric scooters blocking sidewalk in Cincinnati.

The best thing about Cincinnati’s electric scooter rental program is that you can grab a scooter at Point A, ride it to Point B, and just leave it there. No need to bring it back, and no need either to put it into a dock. The sidewalk will do.

The worst thing about Cincinnati’s electric scooter rental program is that you can grab a scooter at Point A, ride it to Point B, and just leave it there. No need to bring it back, and no need either to put it into a dock. The sidewalk will do.

As Evanston actively considers having an electric scooter rental program here, lessons from other communities on what works and what doesn’t could help Evanston avoid problems which have plagued other places.

Take Cincinnati, for example, where I was a reporter for many years and returned for a Memorial Day weekend visit.

While the scooter rental program is incredibly popular, with the two-wheeled vehicles zipping around town, there have been so many negatives that the Queen City recently notified the two scooter franchisees that the whole program might just be scrapped.

Sidewalk scooter ridiing is illegal in Cincinnati but happens often.

According to a city email obtained by radio station WVXU, “the City Administration, in response to mounting e-scooter-program-associated issues, is considering the possibility of terminating the e-scooter program and banning the e-scooters from operating in the city.”

While it seems unlikely the popular program will indeed be ended, Cincinnati cut scooter program hours from 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. to 6 a.m. to 6 p.m., as talks with franchisees Bird and Lime are ongoing to resolve the troubles.

Scooters in Cincinnati are supposed to be parked upright and not blocking pedestrian access on sidewalks.

Many of those troubles are obvious, illegal, and you can’t miss them. Riding on sidewalks. Riding after curfew. Underage riding. Leaving the scooters in a way that they block pedestrian traffic (“Intrusive Parking,” according to an email to Evanston Now from Cincinnati’s Department of Transportation and Engineering). And riding the wrong way on a one-way street.

Not only that, but “Riding while in support of, and engaged in Criminal Activity,” was also mentioned in Cincinnati’s email to Evanston Now.

Cara Pratt, Evanston’s director of sustainability and resilience, is working on bringing an e-scooter program here. Before taking the job in Evanston, Pratt worked in Racine, Wisconsin, and helped set up the e-scooter program there last summer.

Pratt tells Evanston Now that she met recently with representatives of Lyft, the company that has Evanston’s Divvy Bike franchise, and has “right of first refusal” on adding e-scooters, if Evanston leaders want such vehicles.

Pratt says Lyft suggested having a docked scooter program here, as opposed to the “dockless/leave it almost anywhere” system seen in Cincinnati and other places.

A Divvy bike docking station near Northwestern University in Evanston.

A docked program would be similar to Divvy Bike, where you pay for a certain amount of time, but must return the scooter to a permanent dock rather than leave it on the sidewalk.

While that may be less convenient for riders, it also minimizes “scooter clutter,” where unused two-wheeled vehicles get in the way of two-legged pedestrians.

Racine has a “dockless” program, but Pratt says the city there hired two people to move scooters that had been left in the wrong spots.

“We got calls from residents who didn’t want scooters parked in front of their houses,” Pratt says.

She says Racine was committed to “having an abundance of places” where leaving a scooter was OK, such as near light poles, as long as the scooters were not in the street.

Cincinnati’s dockless program allows scooters to be left on the sidewalk, but the vehicles are supposed to be parked upright, and out of pedestrian flow.

Both cities allow scooters on bike paths. Otherwise, they’re supposed to be ridden on the street.

Legal scooter usage (on street) in Cincinnati. Helmets are “highly recommended” but not highly utiilized.

A Racine lesson Evanston might look at is limiting the number of scooters, and even limiting the number of franchisees.

Racine, which has about the same-sized population as Evanston, has a 100-scooter cap for its pilot program with a single scooter firm (Bird).

Cincinnati, which has four times the population (300,000) allows a total of 800 scooters, 400 per franchisee. If you think the scooters are everywhere in downtown Cincinnati, you’re not far from wrong.

Scooters lined up neatly in Cincinnati and ready to be rented.

Cincinnati also requires the franchisees to collect the scooters after curfew, store them and then put them back out in the morning. The electric vehicles do have to be recharged, so some sort of collection is necessary, unless the scooters are left in docks that could be charger-equipped.

There are some technological features which can be added to scooters, and perhaps mandated by a city. One feature automatically stops the scooter from operating at a set time (such as curfew hour).

Another, called “geo-fencing,” can shut a scooter down if it enters a prohibited area, such as a sidewalk. And there are also ways to require proof of age in an app and credit/card-based rental system, to make sure users are over 18.

After Cincinnati tightened its scooter curfew, a represenative for Bird issued a media statement saying in part “Shared e-scooters are a critical, eco-friendly transportation alternative…”

The statement added that Bird has already activated an ID scan to verify age and said the company wants to work with the Cincinnati officials, hoping the “City will retract its decision to implement a curfew which penalizes … tens of thousands of responsible riders….”

In Evanston, Pratt says there will definitely be public input before the city decides whether to move forward with an e-scooter program, and if so, how it would operate.

Evanston has already asked Lyft for cost estimates for both a docked and dockless system.

“Lyft will do whatever we want them to do,” Pratt says.

Assuming all the questions are resolved, and the Evanston City Council signs off on an operating plan, Pratt says “it’s possible to have scooters by fall,” presumably in a pilot to iron out the bugs.

One thing that will always be difficult, whatever the system, is enforcement.

Cincinnati has a $100 fine for scooter ordinance violations.

But police priorities do not include chasing scooter-riding-millenials down the sidewalk.

According to Cincinnati’s Department of Transportation and Engineering, “We are not actively issuing tickets to e-Scooter riders.”

Jeff Hirsh joined the Evanston Now reporting team in 2020 after a 40-year award-winning career as a broadcast journalist in Cincinnati, Ohio.

Join the Conversation


  1. We oldest millennials are about to turn 40… are you sure we’re the ones who’ll be zipping down Evanston’s sidewalks on e-scooters and taking down pedestrians? In any case, I don’t trust Evanston not to screw this up. The e-scooters will be practically useless if they need to be docked. I’d like to use one to get from my home to a CTA train station, but this city prioritizes cars in every possible way despite its aggravating traffic and parking issues, so I won’t hold my breath.

  2. I’m sure that without required docking, scooters will be left everywhere. There’s too many lazy people in the world. I like the scooter idea but the devil is always in the details. Let’s make a program that works for all.

  3. IDK, Maybe it’s an issue with the scooter company. The scooters I rented in Santa Monica explicitly warn in the App that if the scooter is left in an unapproved area that you can be charged. They all operate off geolocation so it’s easy to tell if it is just abandoned in the middle of the side walk. I feel like most people just leave them close to the road and not in the middle of the walk way.

  4. I used to live in Austin, Texas and let me tell you — require docking. You don’t want to see the disaster that occurs when you can leave the scooters anywhere. Not only are they eyesores, but it ruins accessibility for the disabled (and sometimes bicycles.) Even without requiring docking, people will leave the scooters in piles at popular locations anyway. Trust me, docking is critical to making a program like this work.

  5. I think an undocked scooter program is a disastrous idea. Downtown Evanston and Central Street sidewalks are already crowded with pedestrians, especially on weekends. I can’t imagine adding scooters lying in the sidewalk to the mix; this would be dangerous for pedestrians of all ages. In addition, the proposed program would be yet another source of litigation for the City to defend. If someone tripped over a scooter lying in the sidewalk and was injured, you can be sure he/she would bring a personal injury lawsuit against the City. Enough of our tax money has already been spent to settle lawsuits that should never have been brought. The undocked scooter program would be a reckless decision by and for the City.

  6. Why do we need scooters? Practically every ‘L’ stop in Evanston had a Divvy Bike right next to it, and some Divvy bike parks are not at the ‘L’ but in residential areas or about 6 on Northwestern campus. What is the point of BIKE lanes if you’re looking at doing scooters, makes no sense.

  7. In a city with a lot of senior citizens, electric scooters zipping around are definitely dangerous,

  8. Scooters are not only a solution in search of a problem, they are also a mode of transportation in search of an appropriate place to function. As a driver, pedestrian, and cyclist in this town, I have experienced the negative impact to public safety that scooters have on the roadways, sidewalks, and bike lanes, which will grow significantly once this program is rolled out. Hopefully the powers that be at the city are paying as much attention to the warning signs from other cities as they are the potential revenue this program may bring, but I’m doubtful.

    1. Great comment from Edward C. It is easy — too easy — to frame scooters as part of some eco-friendly transportation “strategy” or “sustainability framework” in a way that obscures virtually every other practical consideration. And perhaps a few scooters with their toxic lithium ion battery packs end up in the lake? Last I checked, we had not quite cracked the code as it relates to making Evanston a bike-friendly community. The helmet-less folks daring enough to use these scooters would be better served walking, or at least using the biomechanical force required of a bicycle to propel themselves around town.

  9. I live in downtown Evanston. There are already “No bikes on sidewalks signs” (for many years) on my block that some bikers don’t pay attention to. People that live here are walking with their children, dogs, and friends.
    Aren’t there bike paths near the lake front?

    1. Marcia, I agree there should be some level of enforcement when cyclists either ride on the sidewalk or travel the wrong way in a bike lane. It disrupts traffic, pedestrians, and other cyclists. However, you’re saying that people shouldn’t ride their bikes downtown because there are bike paths along the lakefront – you seem to be confused that people only ride bikes in this town for recreation, whereas a significant portion of cyclists are commuters and residents running errands or patronizing local businesses. Please learn yourself about the ways of the common man.

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *