A second development team is about to unveil a condo tower proposal for Evanston’s Fountain Square.

Fountain Square

Viewed from a block away at Grove Street, the existing Fountain Square Building is dwarfed by its neighbors, the Rotary International Building, Sherman Plaza and the 1603 Orrington building.

Developer Bob Horner confirmed today that his team will present their plans at an executive session of the Evanston City Council Monday night.

Mr. Horner said he didn’t want to discuss details of the project in advance of the meeting with the aldermen. “I want them to hear about it first rather than read about it in the newspaper,” he added.

He said the secret meeting with the council was appropriate because the project involves changes to the city-owned Fountain Square plaza.

Mr. Horner said his proposal would involve redevelopment of the Fountain Square building at the south end of the block and the Hahn Building at mid-block.

The first proposal for the block, from developers Tim Anderson and James Klutznick, was revealed last month. It calls for a 49-story tower on the site of the 708 Church St. building at the north end of the block. Anderson and Klutznick developed the recently-completed Sherman Plaza complex just west of Fountain Square.

Persons who’ve been briefed on the Horner proposal who asked not to be identified by name say the plan calls for a mixed-use commercial and residential building about 35 stories tall.

The new proposal reportedly would include the developers paying for improvements to the city-owned plaza. The first tower plan argues the city should use property tax revenue to demolish the Fountain Square building and enlarge and rebuild the plaza.

The sources said the latest proposal would include new construction set back from the lot line over the landmarked three-story Hahn Building and that the building itself would be preserved.

Mr. Horner, an Evanston resident, is co-principal of Winthrop Properties, which is developing the Winthrop Club high rise approved for 1567 Maple Ave. and converted the former Marshall Fields store into the Evanston Galleria condominium and retail complex.

Because the two tower proposals involve separate land parcels, it’s conceivable the city could approve both. City officials, struggling with how to fill a nearly $100 million shortfall in police and fire pension funding, may welcome the new tax revenue stream the projects would provide, as well as a source of funds to rebuild the decaying Fountain Square plaza.

Sources say the two development teams may seek to coordinate their proposals, but that such discussions are only at a very preliminary stage.

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. Downtown Moratorium Needed Now
    Once again, the City is in “secret” meetings making plans for a valuable section of downtown real-estate without ANY downtown plan in place. Sure, we’re going to spend about $200,000 we don’t have to hire a consulting firm to see that a downtown plan is developed, but the horse is already out of the barn. The City Council HAS the authority to call a moratorium on ALL downtown development (no exceptions, no mythical “pipeline”) until a valid plan is established. A downtown plan committee has been working for well over a year, and in that time the Council has been more than willing to let inappropriate projects proceed without any regard to planning. Let the taxpayer beware… these new high-rises will NOT solve the city’s financial woes, especially the pension funds. It is time for citizens to say “enough is enough.” Development with a “PLAN” is good. Haphazard spot zoning with fantasies of “solving all our financial problems” is misleading at best and borders on criminal negligence. The taxpayers (remember us?) need a chance to weigh in on development plans BEFORE any project has the “blessing” of the Council. It seems to me that the city organizational chart has the citizens at the top, somehow we’ve forgotten that fact. Do the right thing and put a moratorium on downtown development until things can get sorted out.

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published.