Some backers of Evanston’s branch libraries argue the city’s library department should divorce itself from city government.

They contend the city’s library system would be better off if — like Wilmette’s library — it was a separate taxing district, independent of the city.

The branch libaries are slated for closure under the budget submitted by City Manager Wally Bobkiewicz that’s now being reviewed by the City Council, including at a budget workshop scheduled for 8:30 this morning. The closures would save about $425,000 as the city tries to close a $9.5 million gap in its budget.

Former 3rd Ward alderman Emily Guthrie is among those arguing for the split.

She says towns, like Wilmette, that have separate library districts provide more financial support for their libraries than Evanston does.

The Public Library District Act of 1991 provides several methods by which an existing library can be converted to an independent public library district.

But only two options are available for a library established as Evanston’s was under the Illinois Local Library Act.

One way would be for the City Council to approve a resolution adopted by the existing library board.

But, using that approach, the new library district would initially be limited by state statute to imposing a property tax rate of no more than 0.15 percent. At current property values that would yield essentially the same revenue that the library now gets from the city, about $4.5 million a year.

The other option is for advocates of the divorce to gather petition signatures from 10 percent of the city’s registered voters. That would force a referendum vote on the issue, and the referendum question could specify any funding level desired by the advocates up to a rate of 0.60 percent — or four times what Evanston’s library spends now.

Jonathan Perman, executive director of Evanston’s Chamber of Commerce, says creating a separate library district would add to what’s already a major problem in Illinois — the fragmentation of local government. He says Illinois has more governmental units than almost any other state and the fragmentation cost taxpayers a lot.

He suggested the branch library backers, if they really want a separate district, might look instead toward library consolidation across municipal boundaries, something also permitted under the state law. That could permit more operating efficiencies and resource sharing.

City Manager Wally Bobkiewicz has suggested that separating the library would increase costs, because the library now shares a variety of functions, including accounting and human resources, with the city, functions that would have to be separately staffed by an independent library district.

But Guthrie minimizes that concern, saying a new library board “could buy QuickBooks for a couple hundred bucks.”

Wilmette, which converted to a separate library district immediately after the state enabling legislation was adopted in 1991, has since gone to voters twice for an increase in its library tax rate, Guthrie says.

Wilmette now raises about $5.1 million a year in library tax revenue. That costs Wilmette taxpayers about $193 per capita, compared to about $57 per capita now paid by Evanstonians for their libraries.

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation


  1. no more taxing entities please
    Taxing bodies have significant reporting and accounting responsibilities which have over time become more and more expensive (it will be interesting to see what the costs associated with the new FOIA regulations will be, for example)–Quickbooks is inadequate to the task of doing the accounting for a public taxing body (not even sure it would be legal), and saying that an accounting system would be few hundred dollars is the kind of uninformed discussion that has beleaguered the budget process for years. Governmental finance has become so complicated that it requires skilled, trained and certified practitioners. Evanston is facing truly difficult times, and none of the answers will be easy. Passion has its place, but it will not replace facts.

    Given that Evanstonians already pay amongst some of the highest per capita/per dollar assessed value taxes in the state,(especially if you live in Ridgeville or Lighthouse overlay areas) I doubt the will exists to tax even higher, especially to add another layer of administration to manage it.

    A vehicle for raising additional funds for the library currently exists I believe-the 501 c 3 Friends of the Library. Those who are passionate should flood the coffers of this charity earmarking contributions for branch operations if that is their desire. If you are of the means to pay more, then do.

    1. The library has disbanded the
      The library has disbanded the Evanston Library Friends, so they are not currently an option.

      The absence of a friend organization does not stop the library from raising money though. There is a library endowment and a fund raising campaign to help improve the collection “The Fund for Excellence” and the book sale which was once a function of the Friends is now a library operation (still staffed by volunteers).

  2. No more taxing bodies
    I love libraries. However, the idea of creating a separate taxing district for the Evanston Public Library has been examined carefully at least twice over the last 15 years by the Library Board and it was determined that costs would be significantly higher. We need to figure out how to offer the most services to the most people in Evanston in the most efficient way – and that does not include branch libraries.

  3. What should branches stock ?
    For those who maintain the branches are necessary for education, will they support the branches if they purchase no novels or other ‘recreational’ reading materials ? The funds saved could allow the branches [or Main] to provide more real educational materials.

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *