cicely-fleming-robin-rue-simmons-20190418-img_0669

Two aldermen told Evanston’s Equity and Empowerment Commission tonight they want the city to acknowledge and apologize for racially discriminatory policies it has adopted in the past.

Alderman Robin Rue Simmons, 5th Ward, and Cicely Fleming, 9th Ward, got general support for the proposal from the commission members.

Fleming, who distributed a draft resolution on the subject to commissioners but refused to provide a copy to a reporter, said, “It’s important that the city make an official statement acknowledging its history, what’s been done in the city based on racism and class.”

“I would like to have this resolution make a bold statement. It won’t heal everyone’s heart, but it’s important to know what we have done as a city to cause harm,” Fleming added.

Rue Simmons said she wants to work on reparations — “how do we draft policies that repair the damage done to black families that were confined to the west end of the 5th Ward, that were excluded from the rest of the city and still in many ways are financially enslaved and haven’t had the same educational opportunities.”

Rue Simmons suggested that black students from Evanston should have free access to Northwestern University and Oakton Community College if they’re academically qualified to enter those schools.

Fleming said the city needs to address the disparity in homeownership levels, which she claimed was only 5 percent in the black community and 95 percent in the white community.


In reality the disparity in homeownership is dramatic, but not nearly that stark. The latest figures from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey shows that 62 percent of white households and 38 percent of black households in Evanston are homeowners.

Rue Simmons focused on the disparity in income levels. Census data shows the median income for black households in Evanston is $50,356 while for white households it’s $93,356.

Fleming and Rue Simmons said they’d both like to see the ordinance that limits to three the number of unrelated people who can share a housing unit abolished and zoning changed to permit greater housing density in what are now R1 zones.


Delores Holmes.

Commission member and former alderman Delores Holmes said she’d started working on the three-unrelated issue in 2005 and it still isn’t resolved.

“A lot of families would rent out spaces in their homes — that’s how they could survive,” Holmes said. But at that time only she and Alderman Lionel Jean-Baptiste supported changing the rule.

The most vocal opposition to changing the rule has come from homeowners near the Northwestern University campus who complained about students doubling up in off-campus apartments.

Rue Simmons said she hoped to get all nine aldermen to support the resolution acknowledging how city rules contributed to racial segregation, but Fleming, saying she was a pessimist, and would be satisfied if it could pass with the minimum five votes.

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. These aldermen are off the rails
    It is unfortunate that you couldn’t get a copy of a key document that was on the Commission’s agenda. It is undoubtedly a public record that would be subject to FOIA. It is in keeping with Fleming’s anti-transparency agenda. Remember she is the alderman who pushed to get the city to stop putting public safety information on its website.

    Putting that aside, let’s look at the Rue Simmons proposal for free NU tuition. A back of the envelope calculation (based on ETHS graduation rates, racial breakdown of the student body, and NU’s acceptance rate) suggests that you would have about 100 students each year eligible for tuition. At $50000/year that would be about $5 million dollars per entering class. Assuming a 4-year term of study to get a degree, we are talking $20 million at full implementation.

    Last year’s city budget was 319 million so we are talking about a 6% slice of the budget to fund this.

    Did they indicate what they would cut to pay for this?

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.