Personal opinions may be barred from city newsletters

Recent ward newsletters in which aldermen opined on public issues.

Evanston aldermen are scheduled Tuesday to discuss whether to ban themselves from expressing their own opinions in city-produced email newsletters to their constituents.

In a memo to the City Council's Rules Committee responding to a referral from Alderman Cicely Fleming, 9th Ward, Assistant City Attorney Alexandra Ruggie suggests that personal opinions of elected officals should be barred from the newsletters.

Ruggie says the personal views, when included in newsletters that contain the city logo and are produced using city staff time and the city's email domain, give "the appearance and legal effect that these personal opinions are shared by the City" and "have the potential for liability for the City if the opinions pertain to isues that go to future litigation."

She suggests that elected officials who wish to share their personal opinions about city business with their constituents should do so in their own capacity, "without the City's logo, without use of City staff time and without utilizing the City's email domain."

For the most part ward newsletters have had anodyne content -- mostly reprinting city news releases and providing meeting announcements.

But on a few occasions recently some aldermen have injected their own views into their newsletters -- as when Alderman Tom Suffredin, 6th Ward, and Fleming each explained why they voted against approving the city budget and when Suffredin urged rejection of a zoning change to permit commercial events at Welsh-Ryan Arena.

Apparently only Alderman Ann Rainey, 8th Ward, currently operates an independent system for communicating with constituents, using the QuickTopic message board platform.

Ruggie didn't provide a response to the other question Fleming posed, about whether a departing alderman should be able to get a copy of the list of the email addresses of the recipients of their ward newsletter, but said the Council needs to set a policy about that.

Topic: 

Comments

Some Aldermanic Opinions Acceptable--Not All

I am a Sixth Ward resident and the recipient of Ald. Suffredin's occasional newsletters.  I am perfectly happy for him to describe his rationale for voting against the Budget in the Sixth Ward newsletter; this type of information is useful for me.

On the other hand, Suffredin's remarks about former city manager Wally Bobkiewicz some months ago were entirely inappropriate for a ward newsletter.  Suffredin stated that it was wrong of Mr. Bobkiewicz to apply for jobs in another part of the country (where, I believe, he has family).  Suffredin argued that the City should somehow prevent Mr. Bobkiewicz from applying for jobs elsewhere during his tenure as Evanston city manager.

Not surprisingly, the City did not act on Suffredin's unsupportable--and likely unlawful--suggestion. I thought Mr. Bobkiewicz was a brilliant city manager and wish he were still in Evanston, but I would never advocate for trying to force him to remain in Evanston.