In Evanston’s residential development market, 2013 cleared out a backlog of projects that had stalled during the real estate crisis that began in 2007.

The 214-unit AMLI Residential development on Chicago Avenue was first announced in early 2008 and won city approval for a scaled-down version late that year. But with the housing market slowdown, demolition of the old retail buildings on the site didn’t start until late 2011, with groundbreaking early last year.

The 175-unit 1717 Ridge building, for years was just a hole in the ground after the developer of the adjacent Sienna condominium complex went bankrupt after completing only two of four planned buildings. But with a new developer, and a new design for a single rental building the project was revived, with construction completed last Spring.   And the developers sold it in September for about $70 million — described as the highest price per unit ever paid for a suburban Chicago development.

The 80-unit Central Station development, originally approved in 2007 as a condo project called The Eastwood on the former site of the Evanston Theater, broke ground in mid-2012 as a rental development and was completed this year.

E2, a 356-unit two-tower rental development on Emerson Street downtown between Maple and Oak avenues, broke ground in October. It’s scheduled for completion in 2015. The west tower tower had been approved as a condo project in 2006, the east tower as a rental project in 2007. And, after a long hiatus they were revived in late 2012 with a new lead developer.

But while all those project eventually went forward, aldermen last month shot down plans for what would have been the city’s tallest building — refusing to give the developer of the 708 Church St. tower, originally approved in 2009, an extention of time to begin construction.

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation


  1. Why

    With nearly 800 housing there should be a huge surge in new property taxes collected. Can someone please tell me why individual properties continue to see taxes to rise at rates that far exceed inflation?

    1. Why not

      While the new buildings will likely increase the total assessed value of property in the city, it only requires a little math work to see that a "huge surge" in new tax revenue is an unrealistic assumption.

      First, the Census Bureau says that as of 2010 Evanston had over 33,000 housing units. So adding 825 is only a 2.5 percent increase. And you'll notice that 356 of those units are still under construction and not taxable yet.

      Second, it's not just residential property that is subject to property taxes — commercial and industrial property is too. If you look at the land area occupied by these buildings, it totals just under six acres. Excluding non-taxable roads and parks and otherwise tax exempt land, Evanston has about 4.4 square miles, or 2,800 acres, of taxable land.

      These four buildings occupy about two-tenths of one percent of the city's taxable land. Because of the intensity of their development, they'll have a higher than average tax bill — but it's still not enough to make a radical change in anybody else's tax burden.

      — Bill

  2. Cost of all these new units to the taxpayers

    I keep wondering what the overall cost to the tax payers is in terms of the infrastructure required for these buildings – strain on sewer system, wear and tear on streets, schools, recreational facilities. I'd love to see some calculations having to do with these things. 

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *