Daniel Biss.

Evanston’s City Council is scheduled to vote Monday on a plan to limit the ability of a single alder to set the council’s agenda.

The proposal, originated by Mayor Daniel Biss in September, would require that any proposed policy change have at least two co-sponsors, in addition to its initial proponent, to be assigned by the Referrals Committee to be worked on by city staff and other council committees.

Biss has described the purpose of the proposed new rule as trying to “ensure that the referred items have some meaningful support before they consume a lot of staff and committee time.”

At the moment the Referrals Committee is required to forward any proposal from a council member to the appropriate committee and has only limited control over the priority given to different proposals.

A tally of referrals as of the end of September.

The City Council’s Rules Committee voted 9-1 on Sept. 19 to advance the measure for City Council action.

The only vote against the proposal in committee came from the council’s most prolific referrer, Ald. Devon Reid (8th).

But action on the measure was postponed at the City Council meeting on Sept. 27.

It was amended at the Oct. 10 meeting to remove an option for the Referrals Committee to waive the co-sponsor requirement and then held for action until Monday’s meeting.

Given the extent to which some alders have been willing to entertain even questionable proposals from other alders at the committee level, it’s not clear whether the co-sponsor measure, if adopted, will actually result in a significant reduction in the number of ideas that ultimately reach the full City Council for debate.

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation


  1. Alder Reid needs to be reined in. It is absurd that his wild proposals (topless beaches, parks open 24/7, doubling auto taxes on middle class Evanstonians etc) waste staff time when the City is behind on so many issues. Stop the insanity!

  2. This has got to pass at City Council… as a starting point at least, to, as MF says “rein in Reid”. The chart in the article speaks for itself. Sad state of affairs we are in.

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *