Evanston voters will get to decide whether the city should use ranked choice voting to decide local elections.

The City Council Monday night voted to place a binding referendum asking voters whether to adopt the new election procedure on the November ballot.

Seven council members voted to hold the referendum. Two — Ald. Bobby Burns (5th) and Ald. Devon Reid (8th) — abstained from the vote after objecting to a motion to call the question on the issue.

Reid had invited a ranked choice voting skeptic, Jason McDaniel, a San Francisco State University political science professor, to speak to the Council.

Several other speakers, including Benjamin Page, a Northwestern University political science professor; Eric Friedman, an official with the New York City Campaign Finance Board and Evanston resident Alisa Kaplan, executive director of the advocacy group Reform for Illinois, spoke in favor of the system.

Under ranked choice voting, also known as instant-runoff voting, voters are not limited to casting a vote for a single candidate for a particular office.

Instead, they can opt to rank the candidates in order of their preference.

If a candidate receives a majority of first choice votes, that candidate wins.

If no candidate gets a majority of first choice votes, the candidate with the smallest number of first choice votes is eliminated, and those voters have their votes reassigned to their second choice candidates.

The elimination process is repeated until one candidate has a majority of votes and wins the election.

Advocates of the system claim it leads to less divisive campaigns — with candidates seeking to be a voter’s second choice, if they aren’t their favorite, and can lead to the election of more centrist candidates with broader appeal.

Opponents argue that it is more likely to confuse voters.

Related stories

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation

3 Comments

  1. Given that most local elections are non-partisan, it is a no-brainer to use the ranked-choice alternative to a run-off election. If nothing else, it saves money. People who need weeks to rethink their preferences after their favorite fails to win probably haven’t been thoughtful enough.

  2. It will create a real interesting vibe when this rolls around on the ballot. The ultra-woke folks are going to probably take an anti-RCV position, because it will prevent them from jamming their people in power with non-majority plurality wins. Will be interesting to see them reconcile democracy vs their politics.

  3. Ranked voting is of the more sensible & practical ideas I’ve heard come out of there in a while!

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published.