Evanston’s Plan Commission is expected to take another look, perhaps next month, at reforming rules that sharply restrict legal student rentals.
If the city removed the zoning code provisions that impose tighter limits on unrelated persons than families in housing occupancy, then the number of people who could live in a dwelling unit would be regulated by the city’s housing code, which is based on the 2012 edition of the International Property Maintenance Code.
As explained by Angel Schnur, senior property management inspector for the city, that code require the following:
- A minimum of 70 square feet if one person sleeps in the room.
- For more than one person in the room, 50 square feet per person.
Living and dining space, in addition to the bedrooms:
- 120 square feet if the unit is occupied by one or two people.
- 200 square feet if the unit is occupied by three to five people.
- 250 square feet if the unit is occupied by six or more people.
A kitchen and a bathroom must also be provided, but Schnur says the code doesn’t specify square footage requirements for those.
The code also permits efficiency units — studio apartments without separate bedrooms. Those require a minimum clear floor area of 120 square feet for one occupant, 220 square feet for two occupants and 320 square feet for three occupants (the maximum permitted in an efficiency unit) — plus space for a separate bathroom and for kitchen facilities.
Under the city’s existing rules, certain types of families — no matter how large — can live in any dwelling unit as long as the square footage requirements of the housing code are met.
But for “unrelated persons” living together — only three can occupy a dwelling unit, no matter how large that unit is.
The city code’s definition of families that don’t face the three-person limit includes:
- Persons related by blood, marriage or adoption,
- Two unrelated persons and their children,
- Certain collective living arrangements of established religious organizations.
During last week’s Plan Commission meeting, commission members began to discuss the issue. But they were hampered by the lacked a full explanation from city staff of the housing code provisions.
The three-unrelated rule is often ignored and is unfairly applied based on the family definition rather than the size of properties, Giljohann said.
But a resident of the 1900 block of Orrington Avenue complained that absentee landlords who permit students to crowd into buildings create an environment that leads to the tenants holding loud parties that disturb neighbors.
Supporters of the restriction also argue that — at least in theory — it puts a cap on the rental income an owner can derive from a building and therefore discourages the conversion of single family homes into rental units.
Plan Commissioner George Halik said the issue of noise complaints keeps coming up over and over. “Clearly the way things are isn’t working,” he said. “There’s got to be a better way.”
Commissioner John Hewko said the city should move to rules based on square footage rather than familial relationships.
But he questioned whether the housing code’s square footage rules were “sufficiently robust to ensure that you’re not getting a huge number of people crammed in and creating a boarding house-type situation.”
Commissioners also raised a range of other issues — from whether the housing code limits were unfair to large families to how else the city might try to address noise complaints if the three-unrelated rule were eliminated.
Staff promised to come up with some possible alternatives for a future commission meeting.
Plan panel to discuss ‘family’ zoning (11/11/20)