The City Council’s Planning and Development Committee postponed action this week on new guidelines for the city’s affordable housing fund amid questions about how to assure that inexpensive homes aren’t created only in certain parts of town.

The City Council’s Planning and Development Committee postponed action this week on new guidelines for the city’s affordable housing fund amid questions about how to assure that inexpensive homes aren’t created only in certain parts of town.

“If we subsidize housing, we need to consider dispersing affordable housing in the community,” Alderman Ann Rainey, 8th Ward, said.

“Last month I had another inquiry from a developer who wants to buy a building and make it all subsidized units,” she added, “that would impact a neighborhood that’s already impacted” with various problems.

Mayor Lorraine Morton said she agreed. “The whole purpose of inclusionary housing should be to make sure that when affordable housing is built you don’t just put it in one part of town but all over the city.”

“Now the city has an excellent opportunity to get inclusionary housing going,” the mayor added, “we need a committment to provide inclusionary housing in all nine wards and find ways to implement that.”

“We should never permit it to be in just one section of the city,” Mayor Morton said, to which Alderman Elizabeth Tisdahl, 7th Ward, responded “I would second that.”

Including out?

Despite the committee discussion, it appears that zoning revisions contained in the Central Street Master Plan now before the Plan Commission could have the affect of freezing out new affordable housing from the north end of town.

The plan would reduce existing building height limits along most of Central Street.

In an interview, Community Development Director James Wolinski said that as a result of the height reductions, if the rezoning is adopted it is likely that no new projects on Central Street would be big enough to reach the 24-unit limit that triggers the city’s new inclusionary housing ordinance.

Under that limit developers are not required to make any provision for affordable units in their projects. Over the limit they either have to include affordable units on site or contribute at least $4,000 per unit to an affordable housing fund.

Mr. Wolinski says that, even assuming some parcels were combined to create a project site, the new height limits would probably restrict developments on Central Street to at most 12 to 18 units, especially given requirements along much of the street to provide retail uses on the ground floor.

After aldermen voted April 12 to send the Central Street plan to the Plan Commission for review, Alderman Lionel Jean-Baptiste, 2nd Ward, said he’d noticed that it makes no provision for affordable housing. But he said that if that’s the sort of plan “the gentry” who live in North Evanston want, it’s likely to be what they’ll get.

Local developer Walter Kihm said the plan is likely to stop not just affordable housing development, but all development along Central Street. The three-story mixed use buildings the plan calls for “just aren’t financially feasible these days,” Mr. Kihm said. He says Wilmette discovered that after it down-zoned its commercial districts several years ago and new construction virtually stopped.

Mr. Kihm said a halt to new construction may be exactly what many neighbors pushing for the new plan want.

Jeff Smith, president of the Central Street Neighbors Association, said “I’m sure no new development would be fine with a lot of people,” but that his group is not anti-development. “Not all buildings are as attractive as others and sometimes redevelopment can improve a site,” he added.

Mr. Smith said the Central Street neighbors favor affordable housing and argued that there are a lot of different tools available to promote it that Evanston hasn’t tried yet.

As one example, he said it might be desirable to tighten the inclusionary housing ordinance so that any project with more than 10 units would be covered.

Mr. Smith said that affordable housing is just one of a number of concerns his group has with the current draft of the master plan that he hope can be addressed as the plan moves through the approval process.

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. Lets not let special interests destroy Central Street!
    Its time to stop the developers and affordable housing people from destroying our community.
    Central Street from Greenbay Road west to the bread shop is an unique small shopping area in Evanston. It is probably the best small district in the City. It has many unique shops and small business which make it attractive to shop. The special interests both in the city and outside of it want to use it for new development. Downtown Evanston is not so great – the business which are coming and slowly replacing the smaller shops I can go to any suburb and shop. I can go to barnes and noble at old orchard. I can not go and get a gelato at Linz and Vail which just openned up on Central street at old orchard. Tags bakery is a very strong business – which many use on central street- Panera bread is everywhere so the one in downtown Evanston is of no value to me.( I forgot the bread shop which is also an unique business)
    We do not need to change the area keeping the zoning at a reason height will preserve the area – the City needs to try to preserve the small business which make Evanston unique. Preserving A Small Business district is as important as creating a Historic neighborhood district.
    We do not need four and five story buildings replacing the one and two story buildings in this area of Central Street.
    The affordable housing people and developers could care less about our neighborhoods – the bigger the project the more dollars or more units of affordable housing they will create. The end result on Central Street will be Chicago avenue which is a total mess and very undesirable.
    We do not need to up zone this area, for affordable housing. Alderpersons many want to claim affordable housing should be all over town. The 5th ward is not high density zoning and is one of the most affordable area in town. So what is the problem? lets stop playing the affordable housing politics game. Destorying our wonderful small business district on Central street is too big a price for a few units of affordable housing which will not create any real diversity anyway. Remember the city of Evanston has over 20% (26%) of its housing stock is affordable, we also have over 7,000 individuals living in poverty here, so there is plenty of affordable housing.

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published.