In the midst of the economic downturn, many Americans are giving up unnecessary expenses: new cars, vacations and now – divorce. According to a study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, divorce rates have plummeted to depths not seen in nearly 40 years.

In the midst of the economic downturn, many Americans are giving up unnecessary expenses: new cars, vacations and now – divorce. According to a study by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, divorce rates have plummeted to depths not seen in nearly 40 years.

That trend is being recognized by a local nonprofit named The Lilac Tree that provided partial scholarships to some clients that attended last weekend’s Divorce University at Evanston Hospital.

While the full price of the 23rd biannual Divorce University was $125, some attendees paid $5 with a “pay what you can” system.

“What we say is, ‘We can help you now and years from now, you can come back and volunteer,’” said Lorraine Murphy, executive director of the organization.

The daylong event combined the nonprofit’s year-round program offerings — divorce information sessions, workshops, support groups and referrals — into one package.

More than a dozen panelists, including lawyers, financial planners and psychotherapists, educated clients on the legal, financial and emotional facets of divorce. With an audience of 115, the seminar had the highest turnout in over a decade.

Throughout the one-day event, speakers balanced the gravity of divorce with humor in candid talks.

Laughs burst out as family law attorney P. Andre Katz spoke bluntly about his selection of clients and proper courtroom behavior for prospective divorcees.

“Trust me, after the first consultation, we’ll know if this is going to be a nightmare or a pushover,” he said. “We’ve had people who have done well in the private sector and they walk into court and act like animals. You have to think ‘How am I being perceived?’ Because trust me, they’re writing ‘cuckoo.’“

At the same time, Katz advised audience members to be equally cautious when hiring a lawyer. Those shopping for lawyers, he said, should ask candidates if they have ever been sanctioned or found in contempt of court.

“The lawyers who are theatrical, trust me, the judges know them,” Katz said. “You’re going to be stuck with their meshugas.”

Katz also recommended having access to cash that your spouse cannot cut off, along with copies of tax returns and as many financial documents as possible while going through a divorce.

Cook County Circuit Court Judge Naomi H. Schuster outlined the legal divorce process: deposition, disclosure, and settlement discussion, and asked the audience to make their children a priority in the process.

“Your most valuable asset are your children and you need to stay focused for that child to prosper and grow beyond that trauma,” she said. “Children need to know it’s not their fault. To really know what love is, is to put your own needs second.”

Schuster also emphasized working amicably toward a solution with a former spouse.

“Litigants want blood, revenge from the person they thought was their best friend but who is now their archenemy,” she said. “Forget what he did to you. Forget the buttons you know to push to aggravate each other.”

Karen Covy explained her role as a divorce mediator — an independent, neutral third party who helps clients find ways to settle the case themselves outside of court. Mediators do not give legal advice, Covy said, but there are major benefits to mediation.

“Less trauma and drama,” she said. “No one is running to court, which costs more financially and emotionally.”

Other speakers offset the solemnity of divorce with sympathetic and motivational words.

“You can’t stop the waves, but you can learn to surf,” said Gloria Ceccarelli, a former Lilac Tree client. “Don’t beat yourself up about your decision. Loss happens. Have confidence in your intuition. You will pass the test.”

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

  1. workshop for men?

    And what about fathers going through a divorce? Where is the help for them?

    Fathers are always portrayed as the stereotypical bad guy in a divorce. Often times women use children as a means of vindictive retribution against the father.

    Fathers have far less avenues to express their grief/anger/loss than women do, and yet most of the focus is on women. Where’s the equality?

    Don’t always assume that someone makes a better parent or needs more emotional attention just because they are of the feminine gender.

     

  2. Reasonable not fair.

    My hope is that the Lillac Tree is the last stop for women who have tried everything to save the marriage.  Serial adultry, alcholism or abuse not withstanding, divorce is bad for the kids.  No matter how these seminars may spin it.  

    As W. Bradford Wilcox of the University of Virginia recently wrote in National Affairs, an invaluable social-science journal: “The divorce revolution’s collective consequences for children are striking. Taking into account both divorce and non-marital childbearing, sociologist Paul Amato estimates that if the United States enjoyed the same level of family stability today as it did in 1960, the nation would have 750,000 fewer children repeating grades, 1.2 million fewer school suspensions, approximately 500,000 fewer acts of teenage delinquency, about 600,000 fewer kids receiving therapy, and approximately 70,000 fewer suicide attempts every year. As Amato concludes, turning back the family-stability clock just a few decades could significantly improve the lives of many children.”

    Also, perpetuating the psychological trap that the women is a victim gives license to act badly.  The divorce process does not provide justice and rarely is it fair.  The best we can hope for is that the process is reasonable.  To benefit the kids compromise is not always plausible and often times it requires one parent (mostly the father) to lose on principle e.g. choice of school, religion, medical issues, where to live, or the amount  of time with the children – to name a few.  It would be nice if the system acknowleges this situation instead of ignoring it.

    The state require all divorced couples to view a video on how to handle a divorce with real life examples and testimonials.  The state and society would be better off if divorcing couples hear real life examples of divorced spouses 5 years later or more after the dust settles who regret the decision to divorce and the toll it has had on the  finances, the children and the spouses themselves.  Riding waves is fun at the start but all waves eventually crash on the shore.

     

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published.