Evanston plans to hire four more crossing guards this year so the city can keep its parking enforcement officers on the prowl for parking scofflaws.

Until now when school crossing guards called in sick, the city has assigned the parking workers to fill in.

But faced with a forecast 10 percent — or $400,000 — decline in fine revenue next year, officials have decided that hiring the additional crossing guards, for a total of $32,000, makes good economic sense.

Alderman Ann Rainey, 8th Ward, said at Saturday’s budget workshop that the old policy “is the most ridiculous story I’ve ever heard in my life. Why were we assigning revenue-generating people to help kids cross the street?”

Public Works Director David Jennings said the parking officers also have other non-revenue producing tasks — like providing traffic control at special events and emergency scenes — but at least the city now has a solution for the crossing guard work.

But Alderman Edmund Moran, 6th Ward, came to the defense of parking scofflaws.

“Quite frankly, if there was any place I’d be willing to take a revenue hit it would be in parking fines,” Ald. Moran said, “I feel the number of tickets we write is a drag on our economy.”

“We need a more welcoming environment for people coming to our downtown, or we drive them to Old Orchard or other places for fear of getting a ticket here,” he added.

Ald. Rainey replied, “I look forward to hear how you propose to make up the money. We have beautiful garages for shoppers now. People don’t need to violate the law. You can make feel-good statements, but this money would cover the cost of several jobs we’re being asked to cut.”

Alderman Lionel Jean-Baptiste agreed, saying, “This is tied to jobs. I want to know going forward what changes we can make to make sure our ticket-writers are not running around doing non-revenue-generating activity.”

The city still expects to take in $4.2 million in fines from parking tickets, library late charges, false alarm fines and other sources.

Bill Smith is the editor and publisher of Evanston Now.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. Fewer Tickets is a Bad Thing?
    At the risk of sounding like a naif, is there any chance that compliance is the reason for the lowered ticket revenue forecast? As Ald. Rainey said, “People don’t need to violate the law.” Isn’t it possible that they are doing exactly that?

    Perhaps there is evidence that proves the forecast shortfall is due to gaps in enforcement. I am unaware of any, and the thought that $400,000 worth of tickets is being written at 8 AM and 3PM seems like a bit of a reach.

    Considering the fact that various ticket fees have been increased in the last few years (street-sweeping and expired meters, to name two), perhaps citizens learned the wrong lessons. Instead of continuing on their merry ways, enriching the city, they learned *not* to do these things. How awful.

Leave a comment
The goal of our comment policy is to make the comments section a vibrant yet civil space. Treat each other with respect — even the people you disagree with. Whenever possible, provide links to credible documentary evidence to back up your factual claims.

Your email address will not be published.